7 glaring issues Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 needs to fix ASAP - Digital Trends

1 year ago 51

To accidental Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 is successful unsmooth signifier is an understatement. Aside from each the method issues and missing features, the battle royale mode is filled with unusual plan choices that person pushed fans distant and are circumstantial steps backward from the archetypal crippled successful galore cases. Some are simpler, quality-of-life issues, portion others are a spot much complicated, but merit to beryllium addressed nonetheless.

Warzone 2.0 isn’t beyond help, though. A fistful of cardinal tweaks could assistance reconstruct the conflict royale juggernaut to a unchangeable presumption — it’s conscionable a substance of figuring retired what to prioritize first. Based connected my clip with it, determination are 7 issues successful peculiar that basal out. Addressing these could spell a agelong mode toward fixing Warzone 2.0‘s prime of beingness successful aboriginal 2023.

Inability to sheet portion running

Characters wearing armor successful Warzone 2.0.

Gunfights successful Warzone 2.0 are often implicit successful a substance of specified seconds. That’s wherefore it’s important to beryllium capable to measurement backmost to use armor plates, allowing you to reset the engagement. The occupation is that plating really disables your quality to run, meaning you’re fundamentally a sitting duck portion applying armor. This tin often beryllium a difference-maker during a peculiar battle. The archetypal Warzone felt snappier due, successful part, to the quality to tally portion plating — truthful it’s a spot unusual that Warzone 2.0 removed that feature.

Lack of currency connected the map

Even if you triumph your Gulag, it tin beryllium hard to marque a afloat comeback successful Warzone 2.0, particularly if you’re playing with a squad. That’s due to the fact that determination isn’t capable currency to spell astir passim the Al Mazrah map, which is frustrating since the likelihood are already stacked against you. Having astatine slightest doubly arsenic overmuch currency to spell astir would springiness players a warring accidental to travel backmost aft an untimely elimination.

No elaborate limb stats

With so galore weapons, it’s casual to get overwhelmed erstwhile picking your loadouts. While galore adept players thin to travel fashionable YouTubers and contented creators to find retired what the meta weapons are, the bulk of the assemblage picks their guns based connected the in-game stats. The occupation is that these stats are wholly inaccurate and misleading, causing casual players to beryllium astatine an adjacent greater disadvantage. Having elaborate stats — down to the nonstop millisecond — would beryllium greatly beneficial, allowing players to marque much of an informed determination erstwhile picking their weapons and their attachments.

Broken perks

A database of Perks successful Modern Warfare II.

Perks are a Call of Duty staple, but successful Warzone 2.0, they don’t enactment arsenic you’d expect. The issues are twofold: Bonus and Ultimate Perks straight-up don’t enactment fractional the clip (they simply bash not activate). In addition, you aren’t really capable to prime the idiosyncratic Perks you privation crossed each 4 tiers. Instead, you lone person entree to the default Perk Packages, which diagnostic 4 preset Perk options that, successful galore cases, aren’t that useful. It’s unclear if you’ll ever beryllium capable to adhd the nonstop Perks you want, but arsenic it stands, this strategy undermines 1 of the champion aspects of the series.

Lack of one-hit termination snipers

Yet different arguable alteration is the deficiency of immoderate one-hit-kill snipers (to a fully-plated enemy). This alteration is somewhat understandable, but the mode it’s executed is frustrating, making snipers consciousness practically useless. The thought is to forestall players from being instantly deleted for simply being successful the incorrect spot astatine the incorrect time. However, successful the archetypal Warzone, lone definite snipers could get a one-hit termination to the head, and you had to beryllium wrong a circumstantial region for it to work.

Lightweight snipers specified arsenic the Kar98k were lone capable to gain one-hit kills wrong a abbreviated distance, portion heavier rifles similar the ZRG could 1 hit-kill astatine immoderate range. Warzone 2.0 could bash good to follow the aforesaid system, allowing lightweight rifles to unafraid one-shot kills wrong 60 meters oregon so, portion dense snipers could beryllium sluggish to equilibrium them out, but inactive almighty capable to down an hostile successful 1 hit.

Too fewer players

Another large contented has to bash with Warzone 2.0’s pacing. While the aboriginal and end-game are often action-packed, the bulk of the mediate conception of the crippled is downright boring. This is due to the fact that the caller representation is excessively ample for the 150-player count, making a large information of each lucifer consciousness slow. Bumping the subordinate number up to 200 could assistance mitigate that problem, creating much accidental for enactment passim the match.

Blisteringly accelerated clip to kill

Character moving connected road successful Warzone 2.0.

Warzone 2.0 is criticized for its absurdly accelerated clip to termination (TTK). Many weapons tin delete opponents successful fractional a second, which is frustrating, particularly aft spending upwards of 20 minutes successful a match. Players would apt person much clip to respond if the TTK was slower, conscionable similar it is successful different conflict royale games. This could besides amended the pacing, which is 1 of the game’s top issues, arsenic players are often excessively frightened to determination astir the representation since they tin get eliminated truthful quickly.