Added flavors: potential contributors to body weight gain and obesity? - BMC Medicine - BMC Medicine

1 year ago 40

BMC Medicine volume 20, Article number: 417 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Added flavors are a marker for ultra-processing of nutrient and a beardown nexus exists betwixt the intake of ultra-processed nutrient and the improvement of obesity. The nonsubjective of the contiguous nonfiction is to measure carnal and quality information elucidating the interaction of added flavors connected the regularisation of nutrient intake and assemblage value gain, arsenic good arsenic to specify areas for aboriginal research.

Main text

Mechanistic studies suggest that added flavors induce overeating and assemblage value summation by 2 autarkic mechanisms: Added flavors beforehand hedonic eating and override homeostatic power of nutrient intake, arsenic good arsenic disrupt flavor-nutrient learning and impair the quality to foretell nutrients successful nutrient items. Supporting these imaginable mechanisms, added flavors summation provender intake and assemblage value arsenic compared to non-flavored power diets successful a wide scope of carnal studies. They are actively promoted by provender additive manufacturers arsenic utile tools to amended palatability, provender intake, and show parameters. In humans, added flavors are extensively tested concerning toxicity; however, nary information beryllium concerning their interaction connected nutrient intake and assemblage weight.

Conclusions

Added flavors are imaginable contributors to the obesity epidemic and further studies focusing connected their relation successful humans are urgently required. These studies see obesity interventions specifically targeting nutrient items with added flavors and cohort studies connected autarkic associations betwixt added spirit intake and metabolic, arsenic good arsenic cardiovascular, morbidity, and mortality.

Peer Review reports

Background

Food additives are substances added intentionally to nutrient to sphere flavor, arsenic good arsenic to heighten taste, appearance, oregon different sensory qualities [1]. Examples for nutrient additives are flavors, spirit enhancers, sweeteners, colors, emulsifiers, stabilizers, gelling agents, thickeners, and preservatives [1]. Added flavors, besides called flavorings, are defined arsenic products “not intended to beryllium consumed arsenic such, which are added to nutrient successful bid to impart oregon modify odour and/or taste” [2]. The European nutrient instrumentality distinguishes antithetic categories of which added flavors tin consist, specified arsenic spirit preparations which are obtained from antithetic earthy sources and spirit substances which are azygous chemic compounds [2]. Flavor substances tin beryllium called earthy if they are “obtained by due physical, enzymatic oregon microbiological processes from worldly of vegetable, carnal oregon microbiological root […] [and if they] correspond to substances that are people contiguous and person been identified successful nature” [2]. In the United States of America (US), artificial flavors are defined arsenic substances not obtained from spices, fruits, vegetables, meat, oregon different earthy sources, portion earthy flavors are indispensable oils, oleoresins, extractives, and different products derived from earthy sources [3].

Added flavors are utilized successful nutrient for antithetic reasons. Within the past decades, concern processing of nutrient has led to spirit losses which were compensated by added flavors [4, 5]. They prevention costs; improve, change, enhance, oregon complement the sensation of products; and disguise undesirable spirit characteristics [5, 6]. Added flavors equalize the sensation of products with little sugar, fat, and brackish whose request is rising [7]. They are capable to support the emblematic sensation of products and, thus, conscionable user expectations adjacent if determination are variations successful the earthy materials [6, 7]. In the past, added flavors besides masked spoilage and enabled the depletion of nutrient that would different person been thrown distant [5]. Despite their predominant usage successful food, constricted information are disposable connected however added flavors power excessive calorie intake and assemblage weight.

In the contiguous sentiment article, arguments are presented that added flavors lend to the obesity epidemic successful caller decades. Thus, mechanistic studies suggest that added flavors induce overeating and assemblage value summation by 2 autarkic mechanisms: Added flavors beforehand hedonic eating and override homeostatic power of nutrient intake, arsenic good arsenic disrupt flavor-nutrient learning and impair the quality to foretell nutrients successful nutrient items. Supporting these imaginable mechanisms, added flavors summation provender intake, arsenic good arsenic assemblage weight, successful animals and are actively promoted by provender additive manufacturers. In humans, added flavors are extensively tested concerning toxicity; however, nary information beryllium concerning their interaction connected nutrient intake and assemblage weight.

These arguments are based connected the lit hunt summarized successful Additional record 1 [8,9,10,11,12,13] and explored successful much item wrong the adjacent chapters.

Main text

Potential mechanisms for flavor-induced value gain

There are 2 imaginable mechanisms by which added flavors mightiness induce nutrient intake and assemblage value gain:

  • Added flavors beforehand hedonic eating

  • Added flavors disrupt flavor-nutrient learning

Promotion of hedonic eating

Added flavors mightiness induce overeating and value summation by promoting hedonic eating and overriding homeostatic power of nutrient intake (Fig. 1). Food intake and assemblage value are controlled by the homeostatic and the hedonic systems [14, 15]. The homeostatic power aims to support existent assemblage value done metabolic regularisation of nutrient intake and vigor expenditure, i.e., its superior extremity is eating for endurance [14, 15]. Hedonic eating, successful contrast, is driven by the reward strategy and autarkic of vigor balance, i.e., its superior purpose is eating for pleasance [14, 15]. Food intake owed to hedonic mechanisms whitethorn impact other calories which would not person been consumed nether homeostatic power [16]. In situations of vigor deficiency, some systems enactment unneurotic to induce nutrient intake and screen vigor needs; however, they mightiness collide successful food-rich environments [16]. Processing increases rewarding properties and hedonic worth of products compared to unprocessed nutrient items [17, 18]. The availability of these palatable, energy-dense foods successful the modern situation promotes hedonic pathways [14, 19, 20]. In effect to those rewarding nutrient items, the hedonic strategy is capable to override homeostatic power contempt energetically unbalanced conditions [14, 15, 20]. This “eating successful the lack of hunger” (EAH) was convincingly shown successful adolescents who ate highly palatable snacks adjacent aft a repast that exceeded vigor requirements [21]. EAH has besides been linked to value gain, nutrient overconsumption, and nonaccomplishment of power implicit eating successful adults [22,23,24]. Permanent hedonic overeating tin origin value summation successful the agelong word [14]. Added flavors and different alleged cosmetic additives marque products palatable oregon adjacent hyperpalatable [25, 26]. Therefore, added flavors mightiness summation rewarding characteristics of food, beforehand hedonic eating, and override homeostatic power of nutrient intake, starring to obesity successful the agelong term. This imaginable mechanics is illustrated successful Fig. 1. Scenario a depicts balanced regularisation of nutrient intake by the homeostatic and hedonic systems erstwhile exposed to non-processed food, e.g., caller strawberries, arsenic a physiological reward. Here, nutrient is consumed according to vigor requirements (Fig. 1a). In script b, the hedonic strategy overrides homeostatic power of nutrient intake erstwhile exposed to ultra-processed, hyperpalatable nutrient with added flavors arsenic a supra-physiological reward, e.g., strawberry-flavored nutrient items. Here, nutrient is consumed for pleasance autarkic of vigor requirements (Fig. 1b). It is absorbing to enactment successful this discourse that respective additives including flavors, spirit enhancers, sweeteners, colors, and emulsifiers are markers for nutrient ultra-processing according to the NOVA strategy which classifies products based connected “nature, grade and intent of the concern processing they undergo” [25, 26]. A beardown nexus exists betwixt the intake of ultra-processed nutrient and the improvement of obesity [27,28,29,30]. There is sizeable information suggesting that processing techniques applied successful the manufacture of ultra-processed nutrient specified arsenic the deconstruction of the archetypal nutrient matrix structure, arsenic good arsenic the usage of precocious amounts of sugar, salt, and abdominous heighten orosensory properties and vigor density [25, 26]. As a consequence, eating complaint is accrued and endogenous satiety overridden, thereby, resulting successful greater wide nutrient intake [25, 26]. However, nary survey truthful acold has analyzed the imaginable publication of added flavors to excessive calorie intake and assemblage value summation successful humans.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Promotion of hedonic eating. Simplified presumption of hedonic eating a being balanced with homeostatic power (example: caller strawberries) and b overriding homeostatic power (example: strawberry-flavored nutrient items)

Disruption of flavor-nutrient learning

Added flavors mightiness induce overeating and value summation by disrupting flavor-nutrient learning and impairing the quality to foretell nutrients successful nutrient items (Fig. 2). Flavor-nutrient learning describes the process of processing flavor-nutrient associations done repeated experiences with the orosensory characteristics of a nutrient and the consequent physiological impacts and postingestive consequences [31, 32]. Due to these learned associations, nutrient intake tin beryllium matched to nutritional needs (Fig. 2a) [33, 34]. Figure 2a provides a simplified overview of intact flavor-nutrient learning utilizing the illustration of caller strawberries. Their orosensory characteristics are ever linked with nutrients of existent strawberries (Fig. 2a). This consistency betwixt expected and disposable nutrients promotes an intact flavor-nutrient learning which allows the enactment of reliable flavor-nutrient associations and close predictions of nutrients successful the aboriginal with consequent intact regularisation of nutrient intake (Fig. 2a).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Disruption of flavor-nutrient learning. Simplified presumption of (a) intact flavor-nutrient learning (example: caller strawberries) and (b) disrupted flavor-nutrient learning (example: strawberry-flavored nutrient items)

Added flavors perchance origin inconsistency betwixt orosensory characteristics of a repast and associated nutrients. Products mightiness sensation akin contempt differences successful their nutritional creation which causes a higher variability successful nutrient creation linked with a circumstantial flavor. Convincing grounds suggests that variability leads to disruption of flavor-nutrient learning which subsequently impairs some enactment of reliable flavor-nutrient associations and due regularisation of nutrient intake causing overeating and consequent assemblage value summation [32].

Figure 2b provides a simplified overview of disrupted flavor-nutrient learning utilizing the illustration of strawberry-flavored nutrient items too caller strawberries. These products person a akin sensation contempt differences successful vigor and nutrient contented inducing inconsistency betwixt expected and disposable strawberry nutrients which causes disruption of flavor-nutrient learning (Fig. 2b). As a consequence, the inability to correctly foretell nutrients leads to compensatory overeating and assemblage value summation (Fig. 2b). It is absorbing to enactment successful this discourse that rats exposed to inconsistent flavor-calorie pairings gained astir 7% much value than power rats exposed to a accordant flavor-calorie narration [33]. Similarly, humans acquainted with a wide variability of pizzas with antithetic vigor contented person a little expected satiation of a pizza and a decreased quality to compensate calories of eaten pizza successful a consequent trial repast [35].

Added flavors successful carnal feed

Added flavors person been utilized successful the accumulation of carnal provender for much than 40 years [36]. In pigs, they are applied successful the weaning play successful operation with synthetic sweeteners [37]. Palatant additives similar added flavors are besides included successful a wide scope of ruminant feed, e.g., beverage replacers, mineral premix, compound, and concentrated provender [38]. The usage of added flavors successful calves is approved and recognized arsenic perfectly indispensable [37]. Although determination is grounds that the provender intake tin besides beryllium accrued successful cattle, the higher costs for flavored provender mightiness marque the usage of added flavors unattractive to farmers [37]. Added flavors are besides communal additives for reward items successful horses [37].

Added flavors are actively promoted by provender additive manufacturers. One shaper states that its flavors “are utilized by immoderate of the biggest provender companies successful the world” [39]. The aforesaid shaper suggests that “feeding pigs with a well-balanced fare that is highly palatable is indispensable for optimal maturation show and accumulation efficiency” and that “flavors are utile tools to amended palatability and provender intake” [40]. Another shaper states that “addition of flavors to ruminant diets is simply a utile instrumentality to amended palatability, summation provender intake and show parameters” [38].

Various studies person assessed the interaction of added flavors connected provender intake, arsenic good arsenic assemblage weight, successful animals and the main results are summarized beneath and successful Additional record 2. Furthermore, the taxon used, play of life, duration of involution period, and added spirit tested are presented for each survey successful Additional record 2. There is simply a ample diverseness successful reports assessing the usage of added flavors successful carnal nutrition. In general, 3 antithetic survey designs and endpoints tin beryllium distinguished:

  1. 1)

    The archetypal benignant of studies tested the penchant of animals regarding flavored and non-flavored feed. The aforesaid animals were exposed astatine the aforesaid clip play to 1 oregon much feeds with added flavors (intervention) and a non-flavored provender (control). Feed intake per clip portion was the superior result successful these experiments. It was importantly higher for astatine slightest 1 added spirit tested successful the involution arsenic compared to the power successful studies successful goats [41] and ponies [42]. However, 1 penchant survey did not find differences betwixt flavored and non-flavored provender successful lactating cows [43] and different survey adjacent described a importantly little intake of flavored provender successful post-weaning piglets [44].

  2. 2)

    In a 2nd benignant of studies utilizing a within-subject design, the aforesaid animals were exposed consecutively to 1 oregon much feeds with added flavors (intervention) and non-flavored provender (control). Feed intake and assemblage value summation per clip interval were the superior outcomes successful these experiments. They were higher successful the involution arsenic compared to the power for orangish spirit successful a survey with calves but nary quality was recovered successful the provender intake of second-lactation cows [45]. In different survey successful baboons, determination was a inclination towards higher provender intake for 1 (chocolate, effect punch, lemon, orange) but not different (apple, lemon, orange, sugar) acceptable of added flavors [46]. In a 2nd experiment, consecutive exertion of a punch and orangish spirit accrued the provender intake [46]. The authors concluded that the results “may beryllium utile for producing a nonhuman primate exemplary of obesity” [46]. However, the survey had 2 large drawbacks which mightiness bias the findings: First, the proportionality of elemental carbohydrates was antithetic betwixt flavored (25%) and unflavored (5%) chow. Second, the unflavored provender was besides offered during the involution period.

  3. 3)

    In a 3rd benignant of studies, applying a between-subject design, groups of antithetic animals were exposed to either 1 oregon much feeds with added flavors (intervention) oregon non-flavored provender (control). Comparisons of provender intake, assemblage value gain, and last assemblage value betwixt the involution and power groups were the superior outcomes successful these experiments. Feed intake was importantly higher successful the involution arsenic compared to the power for astatine slightest 1 added spirit successful assorted studies successful pre-weaning piglets [47,48,49,50], post-weaning piglets [47, 49, 51], lactating sows [52], and pre-weaning calves [53], and determination was a inclination towards higher provender intake successful pre-weaning and post-weaning piglets [47], arsenic good arsenic post-weaning calves [54]. Body value summation was importantly higher successful the involution arsenic compared to the power for astatine slightest 1 added spirit successful respective reports successful pre-weaning piglets [52], post-weaning piglets, and increasing pigs [47,48,49,50, 55, 56], arsenic good arsenic successful pre-weaning calves [53, 54] and successful calves mostly [57]. There was a inclination towards higher assemblage value summation successful post-weaning piglets [51] and post-weaning calves [54]. Furthermore, last assemblage value was importantly higher successful the involution arsenic compared to the power radical successful pre-weaning piglets [47, 52], post-weaning piglets [47, 55], and pre-weaning and post-weaning calves [53]. In immoderate reports, assemblage value tended to beryllium higher successful post-weaning piglets [50] and successful calves [57]. However, respective studies did not observe differences betwixt the involution and power groups successful astatine slightest 1 play of beingness concerning provender intake [44, 48, 50, 51, 53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62], assemblage value summation [44, 47,48,49, 51,52,53, 58,59,60,61], and last assemblage value [44, 49, 50, 52, 56, 58,59,60]. One survey shows convincingly that caller flavors unconditionally suppress value summation but not provender intake successful the lack of flavor-calorie associations successful rats [62].

Combined, these studies bespeak that added flavors tin summation provender intake, assemblage value gain, and last assemblage weight. However, nary of these carnal studies focused connected the mechanisms for these effects. Therefore, further studies should measure however promotion of hedonic eating, disruption of flavor-nutrient learning, and different imaginable mechanisms lend to accrued provender intake, assemblage value gain, and last assemblage weight. Moreover, results were heterogeneous and changes successful provender intake, assemblage value gain, and last assemblage value were not ever successful the aforesaid direction. A large drawback is that respective between-subject plan studies did not measure each 3 endpoints (Additional record 2). Furthermore, spirit penchant cannot beryllium elucidated successful animals directly, e.g., with user sensory valuation arsenic successful humans [63], but lone indirectly by measuring differences successful provender intake. It needs to beryllium elucidated successful aboriginal studies however these information successful animals related to flavored versus non-flavored diets tin beryllium translated to quality obesity.

Use of added flavors successful quality nutrition

Within the European Union, spirit substances indispensable beryllium approved earlier they tin beryllium added to nutrient successful quality nutrition [2]. Their information is evaluated by the European Food Safety Authority and approved spirit substances are listed successful a affirmative database successful Annex I of regularisation 1334/2008 [2, 64]. In the US, the Food Additives Amendment from 1958 distinguishes betwixt nutrient additives which person to beryllium approved by the Food and Drug Administration and substances graded arsenic “generally recognized arsenic safe” by qualified experts [65,66,67]. Nevertheless, support of added flavors wrong the European Union and the US does not necessitate investigating concerning endpoints similar assemblage value summation and nary specified studies successful humans person been published to the champion of our knowledge.

The usage of added flavors successful quality nutrition reaches acold backmost successful the past with monks successful the medieval property already utilizing earthy substances obtained by distillation from works worldly to spirit nutrient [68]. The concern accumulation of flavors started successful the nineteenth period with the archetypal spirit compounds being isolated from earthy sources [69]. Soon, chemic synthesis of spirit substances started, e.g., the accumulation of vanillin synthesized by Tiemann and Haarmann successful 1874 [69, 70]. The accumulation of flavors and fragrances has been intimately linked wrong 1 industry, called the spirit and fragrance industry, with astir adjacent marketplace shares of the spirit and fragrance parts [71]. In the twentieth century, immoderate decisive changes precocious the spirit and fragrance industry. These see the find of spray-drying flavors successful 1930 [72] and the invention of state chromatography successful the 1960s which led to further exploration and find of flavors [73, 74]. Around the aforesaid time, determination was a inclination towards a healthier manner and consumers attached value to the naturalness of their nutrient [75, 76]. This led to a displacement from synthetic to earthy flavors and was a situation for the spirit and fragrance manufacture which astatine that clip was focused connected the improvement of caller synthetic flavors [75]. Due to this expanding user demand, earthy flavors successful flavored nutrient novelties accrued from astir 35% successful 1965 to 80% successful 1995 with a concomitant alteration successful prices for naturals [75].

In the 2nd fractional of the twentieth century, the worldwide spirit and fragrance manufacture expanded tremendously. For the US spirit and fragrance industry, income adjusted for 2020 US$ worth accrued from US$ 1.9 cardinal successful 1963 to US$ 7.0 cardinal successful 2013 (Additional record 3) [77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90]. In parallel to the maturation of the spirit and fragrance industry, determination was an summation successful US obesity prevalence from 13.4% successful 1961 to 38.2% successful 2013/2014 (Additional record 3) [91]. The parallel summation successful obesity rates and spirit and fragrance manufacture income does not service arsenic a impervious successful itself for weight-inducing effects of added flavors since determination is nary grounds disposable that shows a correlation betwixt the 2 factors. Furthermore, the spirit and fragrance manufacture is simply a wide class and does not needfully bespeak the summation successful income of added flavors.

Conclusions

The contiguous sentiment nonfiction analyzes the imaginable publication of added flavors to excessive calorie intake and assemblage value summation successful animals and humans. Added flavors are extensively tested concerning toxicity but nary studies successful humans beryllium examining the nexus betwixt added flavors, nutrient intake, and assemblage value gain. Therefore, lone indirect grounds is disposable astatine contiguous that added flavors mightiness lend to obesity successful humans.

Based connected the arguments presented successful the existent sentiment article, the relation of added flavors successful quality nutrient intake regularisation and assemblage value power needs to beryllium assessed successful aboriginal studies. More specifically, the pursuing 3 cognition gaps should beryllium addressed wrong the adjacent 10 years:

  1. 1.

    Differences successful nutrient intake betwixt nutrient items with added flavors and their non-flavored counterparts request to beryllium assessed by user sensory evaluations and double-blind controlled trials successful quality volunteers.

  2. 2.

    The effectiveness of obesity interventions specifically targeting nutrient items with added flavors should beryllium elucidated wrong randomized controlled trials and compared to established treatments.

  3. 3.

    Independent associations betwixt added spirit intake and applicable wellness outcomes including metabolic, arsenic good arsenic cardiovascular, morbidity, and mortality, should beryllium defined successful epidemiological cohorts.

Furthermore, it needs to beryllium assessed however promotion of hedonic eating, disruption of flavor-nutrient learning, and different imaginable mechanisms mightiness lend to the overconsumption of flavored nutrient and obesity hazard successful humans. In addition, argumentation strategies should beryllium implemented which alteration consumers to take unflavored nutrient items much easily. In astir countries, added flavors are labeled connected the constituent database of packaged nutrient [3, 92]. However, added flavors usually cannot beryllium readily recognized successful nutrient prepared extracurricular the home. Identification successful this benignant of nutrient is of value since its depletion successful the US has accrued from 17% of mean vigor intake successful 1977/1978 to 34% successful 2011/2012 [93].

Addressing these gaps, outcomes, and argumentation strategies volition amended specify the relation of added flavors successful quality assemblage value power and perchance pave the mode for novel, effectual obesity attraction modalities which are urgently needed [94, 95].

Availability of information and materials

All information generated oregon analyzed during this survey are included successful this published nonfiction and its supplementary accusation file.

Abbreviations

EAH:

Eating successful the lack of hunger

US:

United States of America

References

  1. European Food Safety Authority. Food additives. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/topic/food-additives. Accessed 15 Aug 2022.

  2. European Parlament, Council of the European Union. Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 connected flavourings and definite nutrient ingredients with flavouring properties for usage successful and connected foods and amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 1601/91, Regulations (EC) No 2232/96 and (EC) No 110/2008 and Directive 2000/13/EC: L 354/34; 31.12.2008.

  3. Food and Drug Administration - Department of Health and Human Services. Food labeling, 21 C.F.R. § 101; 01.08.2021.

  4. Editorial comments. The diary and its contents. The Flavour Industry. 1970;1:25–7.

  5. Hall RL, Merwin EJ. The relation of flavors. Food Technology. 1981;35:46–51.

  6. Heath HB. The exertion of spirit successful nutrient processing. Perfumer Flavorist. 1982;7:27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  7. International Organization of the Flavor Industry. Code of practice. 2020. https://iofi.org/. Accessed 7 Dec 2021.

  8. Kirwan S. Phytogenic additives for the rumen: relieving the load connected the metabolism of high-yield cows. FeedMagazine. 2012;95:54–7.

  9. Weiland T. Phytogenic provender additives besides successful sow operations? An alternative. FeedMagazine. 2020;103:24–7.

  10. Pang MD, Goossens GH, Blaak EE. The interaction of artificial sweeteners connected assemblage value power and glucose homeostasis. Front Nutr. 2021;7:598340. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.598340.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Pearlman M, Obert J, Casey L. The relation betwixt artificial sweeteners and obesity. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017;19:64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-017-0602-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shearer J, Swithers SE. Artificial sweeteners and metabolic dysregulation: lessons learned from agriculture and the laboratory. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2016;17:179–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-016-9372-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Davidson TL, Tracy AL, Schier LA, Swithers SE. A presumption of obesity arsenic a learning and representation disorder. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2014;40:261–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/xan0000029.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu Y-H, Vasselli JR, Zhang Y, Mechanick JI, Korner J, Peterli R. Metabolic vs. hedonic obesity: a conceptual favoritism and its objective implications. Obes Rev. 2015;16:234–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12246.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lutter M, Nestler EJ. Homeostatic and hedonic signals interact successful the regularisation of nutrient intake. J Nutr. 2009;139:629–32. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.108.097618.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu Y-H. Making consciousness of metabolic obesity and hedonic obesity. J Diabetes. 2017;9:656–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.12529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gearhardt AN, Davis C, Kuschner R, Brownell KD. The addiction imaginable of hyperpalatable foods. Curr Drug Abuse Rev. 2011;4:140–5. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874473711104030140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lerma-Cabrera JM, Carvajal F, Lopez-Legarrea P. Food addiction arsenic a caller portion of the obesity framework. Nutr J. 2016;15:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-016-0124-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Berridge KC, Ho C-Y, Richard JM, DiFeliceantonio AG. The tempted encephalon eats: pleasance and tendency circuits successful obesity and eating disorders. Brain Res. 2010;1350:43–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.04.003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Berthoud H-R. Metabolic and hedonic drives successful the neural power of appetite: who is the boss? Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011;21:888–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2011.09.004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Shomaker LB, Tanofsky-Kraff M, Zocca JM, Courville A, Kozlosky M, Columbo KM, et al. Eating successful the lack of hunger successful adolescents: intake aft a large-array repast compared with that aft a standardized meal. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;92:697–703. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2010.29812.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Goldschmidt AB, Crosby RD, Cao L, Pearson CM, Utzinger LM, Pacanowski CR, et al. Contextual factors associated with eating successful the lack of hunger among adults with obesity. Eat Behav. 2017;26:33–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2017.01.005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Fay SH, White MJ, Finlayson G, King NA. Psychological predictors of opportunistic snacking successful the lack of hunger. Eat Behav. 2015;18:156–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.05.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Feig EH, Piers AD, Kral TVE, Lowe MR. Eating successful the lack of hunger is related to loss-of-control eating, hedonic hunger, and short-term value summation successful normal-weight women. Appetite. 2018;123:317–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.01.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Moubarac J-C, Levy RB, Louzada MLC, Jaime PC. The UN Decade of Nutrition, the NOVA nutrient classification and the occupation with ultra-processing. Public Health Nutr. 2017;21:5–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980017000234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Monteiro CA. Invited commentary. Nutrition and health. The contented is not food, nor nutrients, truthful overmuch arsenic processing. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12:729–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980009005291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Canella DS, Levy RB, Martins APB, Claro RM, Moubarac J-C, Baraldi LG, et al. Ultra-processed nutrient products and obesity successful Brazilian households (2008–2009). PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e92752. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092752.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Da Costa Louzada, Maria Laura, Baraldi LG, Steele EM, Martins APB, Canella DS, Moubarac JC, et al. Consumption of ultra-processed foods and obesity successful Brazilian adolescents and adults. Prev Med. 2015;81:9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.07.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Juul F, Hemmingsson E. Trends successful depletion of ultra-processed foods and obesity successful Sweden betwixt 1960 and 2010. Public Health Nutr. 2015;18:3096–107. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980015000506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. De Deus MR, Pimenta AM, Gea A, de la Fuente-Arrillaga C, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Lopes ACS, Bes-Rastrollo M. Ultraprocessed nutrient depletion and hazard of overweight and obesity: the University of Navarra Follow-Up (SUN) cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;104:1433–40. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.116.135004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yeomans MR. Flavour–nutrient learning successful humans: an elusive phenomenon? Physiol Behav. 2012;106:345–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.03.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Martin AA. Why can’t we power our nutrient intake? The downside of dietary assortment connected learned satiety responses. Physiol Behav. 2016;162:120–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.04.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Warwick ZS, Schiffman SS. Flavor-calorie relationships: effect connected value summation successful rats. Physiol Behav. 1991;50:465–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(91)90531-r.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Booth DA. Conditioned satiety successful the rat. J Comp Physiol Psych. 1972;81:457–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hardman CA, Ferriday D, Kyle L, Rogers PJ, Brunstrom JM. So galore brands and varieties to take from: does this compromise the power of nutrient intake successful humans? PLoS ONE. 2015;4:e0125869. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Dr. Ernst Kolb GmbH. [The champion for feed! Flavors; Original successful German]. https://www.drkolb-aromen.de. Accessed 8 Jan 2021.

  37. Kolb H, Kolb M. Aromatic substances successful carnal nutrition: a presumption connected the market. FeedMagazine. 2005;88:16.

  38. Mora LM, Oddo JM. Use of flavors successful ruminants. Tech Bull. 27, https://norel.net/en/system/files/TB_27_Use%20of%20flavors%20in%20ruminants_ENG.pdf. Accessed 7 Dec 2021.

  39. Meng CN. Beyond bully taste. Livestock & Feed Business. 2016:34–5.

  40. Oguey C, Faugeron J. Improving provender intake and palatability. Asian Pork Magazine. 2019:32–3.

  41. De Rosa G, Moio L, Napolitano F, Grasso F, Gubitosi L, Bordi A. Influence of spirit connected goat feeding preferences. J Chem Ecol. 2002;28:269–81. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1017977906903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Khelil-Arfa H, Reigner F, Blard T, Barrière P, Gesbert A, Lansade L, et al. Feed ore palatability successful Welsh ponies: acceptance and penchant of flavors. J Equine Vet Sci. 2021;102:103619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103619.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Harper MT, Oh J, Giallongo F, Lopes JC, Weeks HL, Faugeron J, Hristov AN. Short communication: Preference for flavored ore premixes by dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2016;99:6585–9. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Seabolt BS, van Heugten E, Kim SW, Ange-van Heugten KD, Roura E. Feed preferences and show of nursery pigs fed diets containing assorted inclusion amounts and qualities of distiller coproducts and flavor. J Anim Sci. 2010;88:3725–38. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Thomas LC, Wright TC, Formusiak A, Cant JP, Osborne VR. Use of flavored drinking h2o successful calves and lactating dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2007;90:3831–7. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0085.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wene JD, Barnwell GM, Mitchell DS. Flavor preferences, nutrient intake, and value summation successful baboons (Papio sp.). Physiol Behav. 1982;28:569–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(82)90155-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Danielsen V. Flavodan successful provender mixtures for piglets. 1991. https://dcapub.au.dk/pub/sh_meddelelse_803.pdf. Accessed 7 Dec 2021.

  48. Yan L, Jang HD, Kim IH. Creep feed: effects of provender spirit supplementation connected pre- and post-weaning show and behaviour of piglet and sow. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci. 2011;24:851–6. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.11011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang J, Yang M, Xu S, Lin Y, Che L, Fang Z, Wu D. Comparative effects of sodium butyrate and flavors connected provender intake of lactating sows and maturation show of piglets. Anim Sci J. 2014;85:683–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Adeleye OO, Guy JH, Edwards SA. Exploratory behaviour and show of piglets fed caller flavoured creep successful 2 lodging systems. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 2014;191:91–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. King RH. The effect of adding a provender flavour to the diets of young pigs earlier and aft weaning. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb. 1979;19:695–7. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA9790695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Silva BAN, Tolentino RLS, Eskinazi S, Jacob DV, Raidan FSS, Albuquerque TV, et al. Evaluation of provender spirit supplementation connected the show of lactating high-prolific sows successful a tropical humid climate. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 2018;236:141–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.12.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Fathi MH, Riasi A, Allahresani A. The effect of vanilla flavoured calf starter connected show of Holstein calves. J Anim Feed Sci. 2009;18:412–9. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/66416/2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Thomsen NK, Rindsig RB. Influence of likewise flavored beverage replacers and starters connected calf starter depletion and growth. J Dairy Sci. 1980;63:1864–8. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)83152-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Torrallardona D, Llauradó L, Matas J, Fort F, Roura E. Enhancement of the show of 21d aged weanling pigs with the summation of provender flavours. Proceedings of 51st Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, The Hague, The Netherlands. 2000:346.

  56. Lv JR, Kim LH, Zhang KY, Lei Y. The effects of antithetic types of provender flavors connected provender intake and feeding behaviors successful increasing pigs. J Anim Vet Adv. 2012;11:3179–86. https://doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2012.3179.3186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Dusel G, Trautwein J, Hlawitschka B, Landfried K. [Study connected the usage of flavoring agents successful concentrated provender for calf rearing; Original successful German]. Proceedings Forum applied probe successful cattle and swine feeding, April 2006. Berlin: Federation of Chambers of Agriculture; 2006.

  58. McLaughlin CL, Baile CA, Buckholtz LL, Freeman SK. Preferred flavors and show of weanling pigs. J Anim Sci. 1983;56:1287–93. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1983.5661287x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Sulabo RC, Tokach MD, DeRouchey JM, Dritz SS, Goodband RD, Nelssen JL. Influence of provender flavors and nursery fare complexity connected preweaning and nursery pig performance. J Anim Sci. 2010;88:3918–26. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2724.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Danielsen V, Nielsen HE. [Flavourings for piglets; Original successful Danish]. 1981. https://svineproduktion.dk/publikationer/kilder/sh_medd/382. Accessed 7 Dec 2021.

  61. Naim M, Brand JG, Kare MR, Carpenter RG. Energy intake, value summation and abdominous deposition successful rats fed flavored, nutritionally controlled diets successful a multichoice (“Cafeteria”) design. J Nutr. 1985;115:1447–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/115.11.1447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Seitz BM, Flaim ME, Blaisdell AP. Evidence that caller flavors unconditionally suppress value summation successful the lack of flavor-calorie associations. Learn Behav. 2020;48:351–63. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-020-00419-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Lawless HT, Heymann H. Preference testing. In: Lawless HT, Heymann H, editors. Sensory valuation of food. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2010. p. 303–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6488-5_13.

  64. European Parlament, Council of the European Union. Regulation (EC) No 1331/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 establishing a communal authorisation process for nutrient additives, nutrient enzymes and nutrient flavourings: L 354/1. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Food Additives Amendment of 1958, Pub. L. No. 85–929; 06.09.1958.

  66. Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services. Substances mostly recognized arsenic safe. Fed Regis. 1997;62:18938–64.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Van Berge P, Evenhuis B. Flavors into the 21st century. Perfumer and Flavorist. 1998;23:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Torrell FM. The Creative Longview. Flavors of the future. Biotechnology, ‘intelligent’ flavors and beyond. Perfumer Flavorist. 2004;29:16–9.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Introduction ZH. A dynamic concern with sensation - the flavour industry. In: Ziegler H, editor. Flavourings: production, composition, applications, regulations. 2nd ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2007. p. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Pisano RC. The American flavour manufacture - its maturation and improvement and relations with government. Flavour Ind. 1973;4:384–8.

  71. Berger RG, editor. Flavours and fragrances. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Revie GN. The authorities of the spirit manufacture much than 50 years ago. Perfumer Flavorist. 1981;6:50–8.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Broderick JJ, Part III. The authorities of the art: flavorist’s constituent of view. Perfumer Flavorist. 1978;3:20–4.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Stofberg J, Stoffelsma J. Consumption of flavoring materials arsenic nutrient ingredients and nutrient additives. Perfumer Flavorist. 1980;5:19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Sinki G, Labuda I. The spirit industry’s effect to wellness trends. Perfumer Flavorist. 1999;24:13–7.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Broekhof M. Natural flavors - a selling perspective. Perfumer Flavorist. 1987;12:23–5.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Dorland WE, Rogers JA. The fragrance and spirit industry. 1st ed. Mendham, New Jersey: Wayne E. Dorland Company; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Unger L. Basic features, structure, worldwide sales, and competitory concern of the spirit and fragrance industry. Perfumer Flavorist. 1980;5:35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Unger L. The satellite spirit and fragrance manufacture 1979–1981. Perfumer Flavorist. 1982;7:51–3.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Unger L. Worldwide merchant income of flavors and fragrances, 1984–1990: a strategical survey connected aboriginal manufacture trends. Perfumer Flavorist. 1986;11:63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Unger L. The worldwide spirit and fragrance industry, 1985–1990: basal manufacture trends successful an unstable monetary and highly competitory environment. Perfumer Flavorist. 1987;12:27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Unger L. The worldwide spirit and fragrance industry, 1986–1990: basal manufacture trends and strategies successful an unstable monetary environment. Perfumer Flavorist. 1988;13:19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Unger L. Basic concern trends successful the worldwide spirit and fragrance manufacture 1987–1990. Perfumer Flavorist. 1989;14:42–5.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Hartmann H. Scent and taste. Perfumer Flavorist. 1996;21:21–3.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Leffingwell & Associates. 1999 - 2002 Flavor & Fragrance Industry Leaders. 1999 - 2002 estimated income measurement successful millions (Final - November 28, 2003). 2003. http://www.leffingwell.com/top_10_2.htm. Accessed 7 Dec 2021.

  86. Leffingwell & Associates. 2002 - 2006 Flavor & Fragrance Industry Leaders. 2002 - 2006 estimated income measurement successful millions (Final arsenic of January 30, 2008). 2008. http://www.leffingwell.com/top_10_2006.htm. Accessed 7 Dec 2021.

  87. Leffingwell & Associates. 2007 - 2011 Flavor & Fragrance Industry Leaders. 2007 - 2011 estimated income measurement successful millions (Final Estimates arsenic of October 22, 2012). 2012. http://www.leffingwell.com/top_10_2011.htm. Accessed 7 Dec 2021.

  88. Leffingwell & Associates. 2009 - 2013 Flavor & Fragrance Industry Leaders. 2009 - 2013 estimated income successful millions (Final Estimate arsenic of October 9, 2014). 2014. http://www.leffingwell.com/top_10_2013.htm. Accessed 7 Dec 2021.

  89. Leffingwell & Associates. 2013 - 2017 Flavor & Fragrance Industry Leaders. 2013- 2017 estimated income successful millions (Estimates for Year 2017 arsenic of August 22, 2018). 2018. http://www.leffingwell.com/top_10.htm. Accessed 7 Dec 2021.

  90. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. CPI for each municipality consumers (CPI-U). 2021. https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/surveymost?cu. Accessed 7 Dec 2021.

  91. Fryar CD, Carroll MD, Ogden CL. Prevalence of overweight, obesity, and utmost obesity among adults aged 20 and over: United States, 1960–1962 Through 2013–2014. 2016. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/obesity_adult_13_14/obesity_adult_13_14.htm. Accessed 7 Dec 2021.

  92. European Parlament, Council of the European Union. Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 connected the proviso of nutrient accusation to consumers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1924/2006 and (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Commission Directive 87/250/EEC, Council Directive 90/496/EEC, Commission Directive 1999/10/EC, Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Directives 2002/67/EC and 2008/5/EC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 608/2004: L 304/18; 22.11.2011.

  93. Saksena MJ, Okrent AM, Anekwe TD, Cho C, Dicken C, Effland A, et al. America’s eating habits: nutrient distant from home. Economic Information Bulletin Number 196. 2018. https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/90228/eib-196.pdf?v=3066.3. Accessed 7 Dec 2021.

  94. Grizzard T. Undertreatment of obesity. JAMA. 2002;288:2177. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.17.2177-JMS1106-3-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Bessesen DH. Update connected obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:2027–34. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-0520.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Open Access backing enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This enactment was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (SFB 1052/2 C6) and the Deutsche Diabetes Stiftung to MF. The funders had nary relation successful the design, analysis, oregon penning of this nonfiction and the determination to submit.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Nutritional Science, Justus-Liebig-University of Giessen, 35390, Giessen, Germany

    Nathalie Judith Neumann & Mathias Fasshauer

  2. Department of Internal Medicine (Endocrinology, Nephrology, and Rheumatology), University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

    Mathias Fasshauer

Contributions

NJN and MF conceived the probe and wrote the article. The authors work and approved the last manuscript. MF is the guarantor of the manuscript and accepts afloat work for the work, had entree to the data, and controlled the determination to publish. He attests that each listed authors conscionable authorship criteria and that nary others gathering the criteria person been omitted.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mathias Fasshauer.

Ethics declarations

Ethics support and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors state that they person nary competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with respect to jurisdictional claims successful published maps and organization affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional record 1.

Literature search.

Additional record 2.

Studies connected provender with added flavors (intervention) arsenic compared to unflavored provender (control) successful carnal experiments.

Additional record 3.

Obesity prevalence successful the US and inflation-adjusted US spirit and fragrance manufacture income since 1960.

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neumann, N.J., Fasshauer, M. Added flavors: imaginable contributors to assemblage value summation and obesity?. BMC Med 20, 417 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02619-3

Download citation

  • Received: 13 April 2022

  • Accepted: 20 October 2022

  • Published: 01 November 2022

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02619-3

Keywords

  • Added flavors
  • Body weight
  • Flavor-nutrient learning
  • Food intake
  • Hedonic eating
  • Metabolic syndrome
  • Obesity
  • Ultra-processed food
Read Entire Article