This transcript has been edited for clarity.
Robert D. Glatter, MD: Welcome. I'm Dr Robert Glatter, aesculapian advisor for Medscape Emergency Medicine. Joining maine contiguous is Sandeep Jauhar, a practicing cardiologist and prof of medicine astatine Northwell Health, a predominant New York Times op-ed contributor, and highly regarded writer of the upcoming publication My Father's Brain: Life successful the Shadow of Alzheimer's.
We are present contiguous to sermon the rationale for property competency exams for practicing physicians.
Sandeep Jauhar, MD: Thanks for having me.
Glatter: Your recent op-ed portion successful The New York Times caught my eye. In your piece, you notation to a 2020 survey successful which astir 1 3rd of licensed doctors successful the United States were 60 years of property oregon older, up from a 4th successful 2010. You besides authorities that, owed to a 20% prevalence of mild cognitive impairment successful persons older than 65, practicing physicians supra this property should astir apt beryllium screened by a artillery of tests to guarantee that their reasoning and cognitive abilities are intact. The rubric of the nonfiction is "How Would You Feel About a 100-Year- Old Doctor?"
How would you envision specified a process? What aspects of day-to-day functioning would the exams genuinely beryllium evaluating?
Jauhar: A important fig of people implicit 65 person measurable cognitive impairment. By cognitive impairment, we're not talking astir dementia. The champion estimates are that 1 successful 10 radical implicit property 65 person dementia, and astir 1 successful 5 person what's called MCI, oregon mild cognitive impairment, which is cognitive impairment retired of proportionality to what you'd expect from mean aging. It's a important issue.
The statement that I made successful the op-ed is that neurocognitive appraisal is important. That's not to accidental that everyone implicit property 65 has important cognitive impairment oregon that older doctors can't signifier medicine safely and effectively. They perfectly can. The question is, bash we permission neurocognitive appraisal to physicians who whitethorn perchance beryllium suffering from impairment?
In dementia, radical precise often person impaired self-awareness, a information called anosognosia, which is simply a neurological word for not being alert of your ain impairment due to the fact that of your impairment.
I would reason that, alternatively of having voluntary neurocognitive screening, it should beryllium mandated. The question is however to bash that effectively, fairly, and transparently.
One could reason a gerontocracy successful medicine today, wherever determination are truthful galore older physicians. What bash we bash astir that? That truly is thing that I deliberation needs to beryllium debated.
Glatter: The question I person is, if we (ie, physicians and the healthcare profession) don't instrumentality attraction of this, someone's going to bash it for us. We request to leap connected this present portion we person the opportunity. The AMA has been opposed to this, but erstwhile you person crushed to fishy cognitive diminution oregon are acrophobic astir diligent safety. A mandatory property of status is surely thing they're not for, and we cognize this.
Your statement successful your op-ed portion is precise good thought out, and you laic the groundwork for investigating (ie, looking astatine someone's memory, coordination, processing speed, and different enforcement functions). Certainly, for a psychiatrist, proceeding is important, and for a dermatologist, imaginativeness is important. For a surgeon, determination are different issues. Based connected the specialty, we indispensable beryllium cautious to spot the important aspects of functioning. I americium definite you would hold with this.
Jauhar: Obviously, the manus skills that are important for ophthalmological country surely aren't required for office-based intelligence counseling, for example. We person to beryllium astute astir however we measure impairment.
You picture the spectrum of actions. On the 1 hand, there's mandatory status astatine the property of 65 oregon 70 years. We cognize that commercialized pilots are mandated to fundamentally discontinue astatine 65, and air-traffic controllers indispensable discontinue successful their precocious fifties.
We cognize that there's a ample magnitude of variability successful competence. There are internists successful their eighties with whom I've worked, and I'm perfectly wowed by their acquisition and judgment. There are caller aesculapian nonmigratory graduates who don't truly look to person the requisite level of competence that would marque maine consciousness comfy to person them arsenic my doc oregon a doc for a subordinate of my family.
To mandate retirement, I deliberation the AMA is perfectly right. To not telephone for immoderate benignant of competency testing, to me, seems arsenic unwise. Because astatine the extremity of the day, you person to equilibrium idiosyncratic doc needs oregon wants to proceed practicing with diligent safety. I haven't truly travel crossed excessively galore physicians who say, "There's perfectly nary request for a competency testing."
We person to conscionable determination successful the middle. The mediate is either voluntary cognitive competency investigating oregon mandatory. I would reason that, due to the fact that we cognize that arsenic the encephalon changes we person cognitive impairment, but we're not ever alert that we request help, mandatory investigating is the way.
One different happening that you mentioned was astir having the solution imposed connected us. You and I are doctors. We woody with bureaucracy. We woody with poorly thought-out solutions to issues successful healthcare that marque our lives that overmuch much difficult. I don't privation that solution imposed connected america by immoderate extracurricular agency. I deliberation we request to fig this retired wrong medicine and fig retired the close mode of doing it.
The AMA is connected committee with this. They haven't called for mandatory testing, but they person said that if investigating were to occur, these are the guidelines. The guidelines are just and equitable, not excessively time-consuming, transparent, and not punitive. If idiosyncratic comes retired and doesn't trial well, we shouldn't unit them retired of the profession. We tin find ways to usage their acquisition to assistance bid younger doctors, for example.
Glatter: I wanted to segue to an country wherever determination has been immoderate situation to the legality of these mandatory types of property restrictions and imposing the exams arsenic well. There's been a suit arsenic well by the EEOC [Equal Employment Opportunity Commission], connected behalf of Yale. Basically, there's been a interest that ageism is portion of what's going on. Yale present screens their providers opening astatine property 70, and they person a program. UCSD has a programme successful place. Obviously, these institutions are looking astatine it. This is simply a precise tiny portion of the wide picture.
Healthcare systems overall, we're talking astir a fraction of them successful the country, are truly addressing the contented of competency exams. The question is, wherever bash we spell from here? How bash we get engagement oregon adoption and get physicians arsenic a full to clasp this concept?
Jauhar: The EEOC filed a suit connected behalf of the Yale aesculapian unit that argued that Yale's program to bash imaginativeness investigating and neurocognitive screening — determination whitethorn beryllium a carnal exam besides — constitutes property favoritism due to the fact that it's reserved for doctors implicit the property of 70. Those are the physicians who are astir apt to person cognitive impairment.
We person rules already for impaired physicians who are, for example, addicted to illicit drugs oregon person alcohol abuse. We already person immoderate of those measures successful place. This is focused connected cognitive impairment successful aging physicians due to the fact that cognitive impairment is an contented that arises with aging. We person to beryllium wide astir that.
Most younger physicians volition not person measurable cognitive impairment that would impair their quality to practice. To unit young physicians (eg, doc successful their forties) to acquisition specified screening, each successful the sanction of preventing property discrimination, doesn't onslaught maine arsenic being a bully usage of resources. They're much apt to beryllium mendacious positives, arsenic you cognize from Bayesian statistics. When you person debased pretest probability, you're much apt to get mendacious positives.
How are we going to surface hundreds of thousands of physicians? We person to marque a prime astir the radical that truly is much apt to payment from specified screening. Very fewer hospitals are addressing this contented and it's going to go much important.
Glatter: Surgeons person been peculiarly progressive successful pushing for age-based screening. In 2016, the American College of Surgeons started making surgeons astatine property 65-70 acquisition voluntary wellness and neurocognitive assessments, and encouraged physicians to disclose immoderate concerning findings arsenic portion of their nonrecreational obligation, which is beauteous awesome successful my mind.
Surgeons' accomplishment acceptable is rather demanding physically and technically. That the Society of Surgical Chairs took it upon themselves to institute this is beauteous telling.
Jauhar: The wide nine called for screening, but past successful a abstracted survey of surgical chairs, the thought was precocious that we should person mandatory retirement. Now, I don't peculiarly hold with that.
I've seen it wherever you person the aging surgeon who was a prima successful their day, and nary 1 wants to accidental thing erstwhile their skills person visibly degraded, and nary 1 wants to transportation that torch and archer them that they request to retire. What happens is radical whisper, and unfortunately, atrocious outcomes person to hap earlier radical thin to get involved, and that's what I'm trying to prevent.
Glatter: The question is whether older physicians person worse diligent outcomes. The grounds is inconclusive, but studies person shown higher mortality rates for cardiovascular surgeons successful presumption of the procedures that they do. On the flip side, determination are besides higher mortality rates for GI country performed by younger surgeons. It's a mixed bag.
Jauhar: For specialized surgery, you request the accrual of a definite magnitude of experience. The optimal property is astir 60, due to the fact that they've seen galore things and they've seen complications. They don't person a manus tremor yet truthful they're inactive functioning well, and they've accrued a batch of experience. We person to beryllium astute astir who we screen.
There's a learning curve successful surgery. By nary means americium I arguing that younger surgeons are amended surgeons. I would accidental that there's astir apt a tipping constituent wherever erstwhile you get past a definite property and carnal deterioration starts to instrumentality effect, that tin overshadow the accrual of cognitive and surgical experience. We person to equilibrium those things.
I would accidental neurocognitive screening and imaginativeness investigating are important, but precisely what bash you measure? How overmuch of a manus tremor would represent a risk? These things person to beryllium figured out. I conscionable privation doctors to beryllium starring the complaint present and not person this imposed by bureaucrats.
Glatter: I was speechmaking that immoderate doctors person had these exams administered and they tin truly walk cognitive aspects of the exam, but determination person been nuances successful the existent practicing of medicine, day-to-day functioning, which they're not bully at.
Someone made a remark that the lone mode to cognize if a doc tin bash good successful signifier is to observe their signifier and observe them taking attraction of patients. In different words, you tin crippled the strategy and walk the cognitive exam successful immoderate signifier but past person a occupation practicing medicine.
Jauhar: Ultimately, outcomes person to beryllium measured. We can't follow specified a granular attack for each aging physician. There has to beryllium immoderate benignant of screening that possibly raises a reddish emblem and past hospitals and section chairs request to analyse further. What are the outcomes? What are radical saying successful the operating room? I deliberation the screening is conscionable that; it's a mode of opening the doorway to further investigation, but it's not a witch hunt.
I person the highest respect for older physicians, and I larn from them each day, honestly, particularly successful my tract (cardiology), due to the fact that immoderate of the older physicians tin perceive and spot things connected carnal exam that I didn't adjacent cognize existed. There's overmuch to beryllium learned from them.
This is not intended to beryllium a witch hunt oregon to effort to get escaped of older physicians — by immoderate means. We privation to debar immoderate of the outcomes that I work astir successful The New York Times comments section. It's not just to our patients not to bash astatine slightest immoderate benignant of screening to forestall those kinds of mistakes.
Glatter: I wanted to spell backmost to data from Yale betwixt October 2016 and January 2019, wherever 141 Yale clinicians who ranged successful property from 69 to 92 years completed cognitive assessments. Of those, 18 clinicians, oregon astir 13% of those tested, demonstrated cognitive deficits that were "deemed apt to impair their quality to signifier medicine independently." That's telling. These are subtleties, but they're important to identify. I would emotion to get your remark connected that.
Jauhar: It's successful keeping with what we cognize astir the proportionality of our older citizens who person cognitive impairment. About 10% person dementia and astir 20% person astatine slightest mild cognitive impairment. That's successful keeping with what we know, and this was a wide screening.
There are definite programs, similar successful San Diego, for example, wherever physicians are referred, and truthful there's a enactment bias. But this was conscionable wide screening. It's worrisome. I'm an aging doc myself. I privation fairness successful this process due to the fact that I'm going to beryllium assessed arsenic well.
I conscionable don't truly recognize yet wherefore there's truthful overmuch circling of the wagons and truthful overmuch resistance. It seems similar it would beryllium bully for physicians besides to beryllium removed from situations wherever they mightiness get into imaginable litigation due to the fact that of mistakes and carnal oregon ocular impairment. It seems similar it'd beryllium bully for patients and physicians alike.
Glatter: It's hard to springiness up your profession, alteration fields, oregon go administrative astatine immoderate point, and erstwhile to marque that transition. As we each get older, we're not going to person the quality to bash what we did successful our twenties, thirties, and truthful forth.
Jauhar: Much of the absorption is coming from doctors who are utilized to precocious levels of autonomy. I'm surely sympathetic to that due to the fact that I don't privation anyone telling maine however to practice. The crushed this is coming up and hasn't travel up successful the past is not due to the fact that of nonaccomplishment of autonomy but due to the fact that of an existent demographic change. Many physicians were trained successful the 1960s, '70s, oregon '80s. They're getting to status property but they're not retiring, and we tin speculate arsenic to wherefore that is.
In America's acquisition system, doctors incur a immense magnitude of debt. I cognize physicians who are inactive paying disconnected their indebtedness and they're successful their fifties and sixties, truthful I'm precise sympathetic to that. I'm not trying to unit doctors retired of practicing. I conscionable privation whoever is practicing to beryllium competent and to signifier safely. We person to fig retired however to bash that.
Glatter: The information that determination is simply a shortage of physicians forecast successful the adjacent 10-15 years makes galore physicians reluctant to retire. They consciousness similar they privation to beryllium portion of that enactment web and we don't privation to person a dire situation, particularly successful the agrarian areas. We're not immune from aging. We're quality beings. We each person to recognize that.
Jauhar: I cognize that the ACC is starting to statement this issue, successful portion due to the fact that of my op-ed. My anticipation is that it volition commencement a speech and we volition institute a program that comes from physicians and serves our patients, and doesn't service immoderate cottage manufacture of investigating oregon service the needs of insurers oregon bureaucrats. It has to service the doctor-patient relationship.
Glatter: In immoderate random surveys that I've read, up to 30%-40% of physicians bash enactment immoderate benignant of age-based screening oregon competency assessment. The needle's moving. It's conscionable not determination yet. I deliberation that wider adoption is coming.
Jauhar: Data are coming arsenic much hospitals commencement to follow these precocious practitioner programs. Some of the information that came retired of Yale, for example, are precise important. We're going to spot much published information successful this area, and it volition clarify what we request to bash and however large the occupation is.
Glatter: I privation to convey you again for your clip and for penning the op-ed due to the fact that it surely was good work and opened the eyes of not lone physicians, but besides the nationalist astatine large. It's a speech that has to beryllium had. Thank you for doing this.
Jauhar: Thanks for inviting me, Robert. It was a pleasance to speech to you.
Robert D. Glatter, MD, is adjunct prof of exigency medicine astatine Lenox Hill Hospital successful New York City and astatine Zucker School of Medicine astatine Hofstra/Northwell successful Hempstead, New York. He is an editorial advisor and hosts the Hot Topics successful EM bid connected Medscape. He is besides a medical contributor for Forbes.
Sandeep Jauhar, MD, is simply a practicing cardiologist and prof of medicine astatine Northwell Health. Jauhar is presently a contributing sentiment writer for The New York Times. He has appeared often connected National Public Radio, CNN, and MSNBC to sermon issues related to medicine, and his essays person besides been published successful The Wall Street Journal, Time, and Slate. Follow him connected Twitter
Follow Medscape connected Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube
English (US)