An off-the-shelf otoacoustic-emission probe for hearing screening via a smartphone - Nature.com

1 year ago 71

Abstract

Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) supply accusation astir the relation of the outer hairsbreadth cells of the cochlea. In high-income countries, infants acquisition OAE tests arsenic portion of the screening protocols for hearing. However, the outgo of the indispensable instrumentality hinders aboriginal screening for proceeding successful low- and middle-income countries, which disproportionately carnivore the brunt of disabling proceeding loss. Here we study the plan and objective investigating of a low-cost probe for OAEs. The device, which has a worldly outgo of astir US$10, uses an off-the-shelf microphone and off-the-shelf earphones connected to a smartphone done a headphone jack. It sends 2 axenic tones done each of the headphone’s earbuds and algorithmically detects the distortion-product OAEs generated by the cochlea and recorded via the microphone. In a objective survey involving 201 paediatric ears crossed 3 healthcare sites, the instrumentality detected proceeding nonaccomplishment with 100% sensitivity and 88.9% specificity, comparable to the show of a commercialized device. Low-cost devices for OAE investigating whitethorn assistance the aboriginal detection of proceeding nonaccomplishment successful resource-constrained settings.

This is simply a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to Nature+

Get contiguous online entree to Nature and 55 different Nature journal

Subscribe to Journal

Get afloat diary entree for 1 year

$119.00

only $9.92 per issue

All prices are NET prices.
VAT volition beryllium added aboriginal successful the checkout.
Tax calculation volition beryllium finalised during checkout.

Buy article

Get clip constricted oregon afloat nonfiction entree connected ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Additional entree options:

Data availability

All information supporting the findings from this survey are disposable wrong the nonfiction and its Supplementary Information. The dataset utilized to make the results for this survey is disposable astatine https://github.com/uw-x/oae and https://zenodo.org/record/7032657 (ref. 48). Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The customized codification utilized successful this survey is disposable astatine https://github.com/uw-x/oae and https://zenodo.org/record/7032657 (ref. 48).

References

  1. Millions of People successful the World Have Hearing Loss That Can Be Treated oregon Prevented (WHO, 2013); https://www.who.int/news/item/27-02-2013-millions-have-hearing-loss-that-can-be-improved-or-prevented

  2. Childhood Hearing Loss—Strategies for Prevention and Care (WHO, 2016); https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/204632/9789241510325_eng.pdf

  3. Patel, H. & Feldman, M. Universal newborn proceeding screening. Paediatr. Child Health 16, 301–305 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. McPherson, B. Newborn proceeding screening successful processing countries: needs & caller directions. Indian J. Med. Res. 135, 152 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Swanepoel, D. W. et al. Telehealth successful audiology: the request and imaginable to scope underserved communities. Int. J. Audiol. 49, 195–202 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chan, J. & Gollakota, S. Inner-ear cochlea investigating with earphones. In Proc. 20th Annual International Conference connected Mobile Systems, Applications and Services 609–610 (ACM, 2022).

  7. Abdala, C. & Visser-Dumont, L. Distortion merchandise otoacoustic emissions: a instrumentality for proceeding appraisal and technological study. Volta. Rev. 103, 281 (2001).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Walker, J. J., Cleveland, L. M., Davis, J. L. & Seales, J. S. Audiometry screening and interpretation. Am. Fam. Physician 87, 41–47 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mimi Hearing Test (Mimi Hearing Technologies GmbH, 2022); https://apps.apple.com/us/app/mimi-hearing-test/id932496645

  10. Hearing Test—Audiometry, Tone (IT4YOU Corp., 2022); https://apps.apple.com/us/app/hearing-test-audiometry-tone/id1368396053

  11. Hearing Test & Ear Age Test (PortTownSoft, 2022); https://apps.apple.com/us/app/hearing-test-ear-age-test/id1067630100

  12. Thompson, D. C. et al. Universal newborn proceeding screening: summary of evidence. JAMA 286, 2000–2010 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Torre, P. III, Cruickshanks, K. J., Nondahl, D. M. & Wiley, T. L. Distortion merchandise otoacoustic emanation effect characteristics successful older adults. Ear Hear. 24, 20–29 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heitmann, N., Rosner, T. & Chakraborty, S. Designing a azygous speaker-based ultra low-cost otoacoustic emanation proceeding screening probe. In 2020 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC) 1–8 (IEEE, 2020).

  15. Campbell, L. J. & Slater, K. D. Personalization of auditory stimulus. US patent 10154333B2 (2018).

  16. Heitmann, N., Rosner, T. & Chakraborty, S. Mass-deployable smartphone-based nonsubjective proceeding screening with otoacoustic emissions. In Proc. 2021 International Conference connected Multimodal Interaction 653–661 (ACM, 2021).

  17. Heitmann, N. et al. Sound4all: towards affordable large-scale proceeding screening. In 2017 12th International Conference connected Design & Technology of Integrated Systems successful Nanoscale Era (DTIS) 1–6 (IEEE, 2017).

  18. Novel pediatric proceeding screening device. Johns Hopkins Technological Ventures http://jhu.technologypublisher.com/technology/40355 (2018).

  19. Generic eartips from Grason Associates fitment usher eartips. Electro-Medical Instruments https://www.emi-canada.com/new-page-5 (2021).

  20. Newborn proceeding screening protocol. Iowa Department of Public Health https://idph.iowa.gov/Portals/1/userfiles/77/Newborn%20Hearing%20Screening%20Protocol-11-08.pdf (2008).

  21. Parthasarathy, T. K. & Klostermann, B. Similarities and differences successful distortion-product otoacoustic emissions among 4 FDA-approved devices. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 12, 397–405 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Frequently asked questions: EroScan OAE Test System. Maico https://www.schoolhealth.com/media/pdf/51075_FAQ%20EroScan.pdf (2022).

  23. Chan, J., Michaelsen, K., Estergreen, J. K., Sabath, D. E. & Gollakota, S. Micro-mechanical humor clot investigating utilizing smartphones. Nat. Commun. 13, 1–12 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Funk, J. Technology change, economical feasibility, and originative destruction: the lawsuit of caller physics products and services. Ind. Corp. Change 27, 65–82 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Device compatibility overview. Android Developers https://developer.android.com/guide/practices/compatibility (2022).

  26. For iPhone headphone adapter 3.5 mm jack aux cord dongle audio cablegram connector US. eBay https://www.ebay.com/itm/313802818623 (2022).

  27. Device bundle functions including mobile aesculapian applications. US FDA https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/digital-health-center-excellence/device-software-functions-including-mobile-medical-applications (2019).

  28. Policy for instrumentality bundle functions and mobile aesculapian applications. US FDA https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/policy-device-software-functions-and-mobile-medical-applications (2019).

  29. Software arsenic a aesculapian instrumentality (SaMD). US FDA https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/digital-health-center-excellence/software-medical-device-samd (2018).

  30. Software arsenic a Medical Device: Possible Framework for Risk Categorization and Corresponding Considerations (2014); http://www.imdrf.org/docs/imdrf/final/technical/imdrf-tech-140918-samd-framework-risk-categorization-141013.pdf

  31. What are examples of bundle arsenic a aesculapian device? US FDA https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/what-are-examples-software-medical-device (2017).

  32. Examples of premarket submissions that see MMAs cleared oregon approved by the FDA. US FDA https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-software-functions-including-mobile-medical-applications/examples-premarket-submissions-include-mmas-cleared-or-approved-fda (2019).

  33. Chan, J., Raju, S., Nandakumar, R., Bly, R. & Gollakota, S. Detecting mediate receptor fluid utilizing smartphones. Sci. Transl. Med. 11, eaav1102 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chan, J. et al. Performing tympanometry utilizing smartphones. Commun. Med. 2, 57 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Siegel, J. & Hirohata, E. Sound calibration and distortion merchandise otoacoustic emissions astatine precocious frequencies. Hear. Res. 80, 146–152 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Siegel, J. Ear-canal lasting waves and high-frequency dependable calibration utilizing otoacoustic emanation probes. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 2589–2597 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Charaziak, K. K. & Shera, C. A. Compensating for ear-canal acoustics erstwhile measuring otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 141, 515–531 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Maico Diagnostics. School Nurses Guide to Otoacoustic Emissions (OAEs) (2009); https://www.schoolhealth.com/media/pdf/School%20Nurse%20Guide%20to%20OAEs_web%202016.pdf

  39. Hall, J. W. III The Important Role of Otoacoustic Emissions (OAEs) successful Preschool Hearing Screening (2018); https://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/important-role-otoacoustic-emissions-oaes-22091

  40. Technical specifications—Lyra. Interacoustics https://www.interacoustics.com/download/lyra/3111-datasheet-for-lyra (2019).

  41. OtoRead™ – instructions for use. Interacoustics https://www.interacoustics.com/download/otoread/manuals-otoread/1236-instructions-for-use-otoread (2021).

  42. Welch Allyn® OAE proceeding screener—directions for use. Welch Allyn https://www.henryschein.com/assets/Medical/80022349LITPDF.pdf (2019).

  43. r140 Portable OAE proceeding screener. Resonance http://www.resonance-audiology.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/R14O-TECNICAL-SPECIFICATION.pdf (2018).

  44. AVLinearPCMBitDepthKey. Apple Developer Documentation https://developer.apple.com/documentation/avfaudio/avlinearpcmbitdepthkey (2022).

  45. USB Digital Audio. Android Open Source Project https://source.android.com/devices/audio/usb (2022).

  46. Reavis, K. M. et al. Distortion-product otoacoustic emanation trial show for ototoxicity monitoring. Ear Hear. 32, 61 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Goodman, S. S., Fitzpatrick, D. F., Ellison, J. C., Jesteadt, W. & Keefe, D. H. High-frequency click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and behavioral thresholds successful humans. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 1014–1032 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Chan, J. et al. A low-cost smartphone-based otoacoustic emanation instrumentality for proceeding loss. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7032657 (2022).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We convey our participants and their families astatine Seattle Children’s Hospital. We convey K. Sie, D. Horn and H. Ou astatine the Seattle Children’s Hospital and Research Institute for permitting america to enlistee patients from their clinics. We convey S. Norton for her captious and important feedback connected the manuscript and methods. N.A. discloses enactment for the probe described successful this survey from the National Institute connected Deafness and Other Communication Disorders grant T32DC000018. R.B. and S.G. disclose enactment for the probe described successful this survey from the Washington Research Foundation, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Research Integration Hub. S.G. discloses enactment for the probe described successful this survey from the Moore Inventor Fellow grant #10617.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Justin Chan & Shyamnath Gollakota

  2. Department of Otolaryngology — Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Nada Ali & Randall Bly

  3. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Ali Najafi

  4. Seattle Children’s Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA

    Anna Meehan, Emily Gallagher & Randall Bly

  5. Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Lisa R. Mancl

Contributions

All authors designed the experiments and interpreted the results. J.C. and S.G. wrote the manuscript, and N.A., A.M., L.R.M., E.G. and R.B. edited the manuscript. J.C., N.A. and A.M. conducted the experiments and performed the analysis, nether method supervision by S.G. and J.C.; A.N. and S.G. designed the algorithms. J.C. and S.G. conceptualized the study.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Justin Chan, Randall Bly oregon Shyamnath Gollakota.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

S.G., J.C. and R.B. are co-founders of Wavely Diagnostics, Inc. S.G. is simply a co-founder of Jeeva Wireless, Inc. and Sound Life Sciences. R.B. is simply a co-founder of EigenHealth, Inc. R.B. is simply a advisor and stockholder of Spiway, LLC. The different authors state nary competing interests.

Peer review

Peer reappraisal information

Nature Biomedical Engineering acknowledgment the anonymous reviewer(s) for their publication to the adjacent reappraisal of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with respect to jurisdictional claims successful published maps and organization affiliations.

Supplementary information

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chan, J., Ali, N., Najafi, A. et al. An off-the-shelf otoacoustic-emission probe for proceeding screening via a smartphone. Nat. Biomed. Eng (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-022-00947-6

Download citation

  • Received: 08 November 2021

  • Accepted: 02 September 2022

  • Published: 31 October 2022

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-022-00947-6

Read Entire Article