Background: Adverse cause reactions are an important origin of morbidity and mortality successful each patients. Information regarding adverse cause reactions in the pediatric property group, especially with respect to the drugs progressive and the objective presentations is scanty. The purpose of our survey is to find the incidence of adverse cause reactions and to survey their features successful presumption of causality, type, severity, avoidability, drugs implicated and their objective presentations.
Methods: The survey was carried retired connected patients admitted to the pediatric ward and the pediatric intensive attraction portion implicit a one-year play (January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013). Patients either presenting with oregon processing an adverse cause reaction in the infirmary were included in the study.
Results: The incidence complaint for adverse cause reaction causing infirmary admittance was 1.79% (95% CI 1.48, 2.16) whereas it was 1.23% (95% CI 0.97, 1.53) for children exposed to a cause during their infirmary stay. Type B (bizarre oregon idiosyncratic type) was seen successful 114 (62.6%) of the ADRs whereas 53 (29.1%) were of benignant A (augmented pharmacologic effect). Severe ADRs were seen successful 25 (13.7%) of the full ADRs. ADR was liable for the decease of 2 patients. 15.4% were rated arsenic avoidable. Anti-microbials were the astir communal radical liable for ADRs (43.4%), followed by drugs acting connected the immune strategy (15.9%) and drugs acting connected the tense strategy (14.3%). The astir communal ADRs were metabolic (29.3%) followed by neurological (17.6%).
Conclusions: Adverse cause reactions can hap successful a important proportionality of hospitalized patients with immoderate of them being terrible and perchance avoidable. Awareness among physicians should beryllium encouraged regarding monitoring, documentation and notification of adverse cause reactions.
Introduction
“Primum Non Nocere” (First, bash nary harm.) is a cardinal rule passim the satellite for healthcare professionals. Every cause which the physician uses is double-edged, and every cure has imaginable harm. Every cause has the imaginable to person an adverse effect, for which consciousness and monitoring are necessary. Adverse cause reactions (ADRs) origin important morbidity and mortality successful patients of each ages. Before caller drugs are launched successful the market, objective trials (postauthorization information studies) for ADRs are conducted chiefly successful adults. ADRs successful children whitethorn disagree from those successful adults owed to age-dependent pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs. Further, children are often prescribed medications that are off-label putting them astatine a greater hazard perchance for ADRs [1-3]. The bulk of the time, post-marketing surveillance remains the predominant way to observe ADRs circumstantial to children. Spontaneous reporting systems for ADRs are taxable to under-reporting adjacent successful the lawsuit of terrible ADRs [4]. Although the nationalist pharmacovigilance strategy was introduced successful India successful 2010, important under-reporting occurs present arsenic well [5,6]. The spectrum of illness successful children successful each state is not precisely similar. For example, successful India, the spectrum of diseases is antithetic from that successful developed countries, with infectious diseases predominating. Hence, it is important to place ADRs to drugs utilized successful the attraction of diseases endemic to this country. Though children represent 40% of the colonisation of India, accusation regarding ADRs, the drugs involved, and the objective presentations successful this property group, are scanty [2-4]. ADRs tin effect successful unplanned infirmary outpatient visits, unplanned infirmary admission, and economical losses to the wellness work strategy [2]. Hence, an improved knowing of the severity and causality of ADRs is crucial. Studies monitoring ADRs successful children tin facilitate improved strategies for amended absorption of ADRs. Additionally, specified studies whitethorn amended harmless and effectual attraction practices successful the pediatric population.
The purpose of this survey was to prospectively place ADRs successful hospitalized children during a one-year period, to find the incidence of ADRs, and to qualify their features successful presumption of causality, type, severity, avoidability, drugs implicated, and objective presentations.
Materials & Methods
This prospective survey was carried retired implicit a one-year play (January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013) astatine Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College and General Hospital, a tertiary attraction teaching infirmary successful Mumbai, India. The survey was approved by the organization probe morals committee (reference No. SRS/17/12). We prospectively screened each admissions to the pediatric ward and pediatric intensive attraction portion (PICU). The pediatric ward and PICU admit 6,000-7,000 patients (one month to 12 years) per year. Neonates and pediatric surgical patients are admitted elsewhere successful the hospital and are managed by antithetic departments. The lawsuit records, cause charts, and laboratory information of each admissions successful the erstwhile 24 hours were reviewed regular for ADRs, by 1 of the authors. In summation to the screening of the author, our institute besides has a pharmacovigilance section that routinely monitors ADRs successful the hospital. This double-check ensured that the accidental of missing immoderate lawsuit of ADR was minimal. The records of patients who were subsequently reported to person ADRs were besides reviewed successful a akin manner. ADRs were defined utilizing the Edwards and Aronson explanation which is “an appreciably harmful oregon unpleasant absorption resulting from an involution related to the usage of a medicinal product, which predicts hazard from aboriginal medication and warrants prevention oregon circumstantial treatment, oregon alteration of the dosage regimen oregon withdrawal of the product” [7]. We excluded patients admitted with intentional oregon accidental poisoning, medicine errors, and cause abuse. We recorded the pursuing details of each patient: demographic data, cause history, and objective details, and applicable accusation astir the suspected reaction, its onset, dose, duration, and temporal relation with cause intake.
We assessed causality utilizing the World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) strategy for standardized lawsuit causality assessment [8]. We determined the benignant of ADR utilizing the Rawlins and Thompson classification and classified the severity of ADRs arsenic per the modified Hartwig and Siegel severity scale [9,10]. Severity levels 1 and 2 were classified arsenic mild, levels 3 and 4 were classified arsenic moderate, and levels 5-7 were classified arsenic severe. We assessed avoidability arsenic per the standard described by Hallas et al. [11]. We reported the outcome, i.e., causality, benignant of reaction, severity, and avoidability by statement among the 3 assessors. Our estimation for the wide incidence was based connected the sum of probable and definite ADRs. Incidence was calculated by dividing the fig of admissions successful which astatine slightest 1 ADR occurred, by the full fig of admissions successful the aforesaid year, careless of cause exposure.
Patients were included aft taking informed consent from the genitor oregon guardian and oral assent from children betwixt 7 and 12 years of age. All ADRs were reported to the ADR Monitoring Centre of the infirmary (established nether the Pharmacovigilance Programme of India). Descriptive statistic were utilized to picture the data.
Results
The pediatric ward and pediatric intensive attraction portion (PICU) admitted 6026 patients during the survey period. Of these, 182 admissions experienced an ADR giving an wide incidence of 3.02%. ADRs occurred before admission successful 108 of 182 (59.3%) admissions, whereas successful 74 admissions (40.7%), the ADRs occurred aft hospitalization. Thus, the incidence complaint for ADRs causing infirmary admittance was 1.79% (95% CI 1.48, 2.16) whereas it was 1.23% (95% CI 0.97, 1.53) for children exposed to a cause during their infirmary stay. Tables 1, 2 show the property and enactment of hospitalized children with ADR. There was nary property oregon sex preponderance. Out of 182 cases who developed ADR, 27 cases were nonstop admissions to PICU. Forty-four cases who developed ADR successful the ward were transferred to PICU, either owed to the severity of ADR oregon owed to their underlying co-morbid condition.
Age | Total number of children admitted | Number with ADR (%) |
1 month-1 year | 1495 | 45 (3.0) |
1-5 years | 2178 | 64 (2.9) |
>5 years | 2353 | 73 (3.1) |
Total | 6026 | 182 (3.02) |
Age | Number of children with ADR | Male (%) | Female (%) |
1 month-1 year | 45 | 23 (51) | 22 (49) |
1-5 years | 64 | 34 (53) | 30 (47) |
>5 years | 73 | 38 (52) | 35 (48) |
Total | 182 | 95 (52) | 87 (48) |
Table 3 shows the causality, benignant of reaction, severity of ADRs and avoidability successful our patients. Bizarre oregon idiosyncratic types of reactions were reported successful 114 of 182 (62.6%) patients. Reactions classified arsenic levels 5 to 7 were considered severe. In our study, 25 of 182 reactions (13.7%) were severe, with 2 ADRs resulting successful death. Both these ADRs were classified arsenic being unavoidable, terrible type, and having imaginable causality. One decease was successful a seven-year-old miss kid who developed toxic epidermal necrolysis pursuing the medication of ciprofloxacillin. The different decease was successful a nine-year-old lad with tetanus, who developed terrible bradycardia and cardiac apprehension pursuing the usage of vecuronium for paralysis during ventilation. In our study, 28 of 182 (15.4%) of recorded ADRs were rated arsenic avoidable. In 12 patients, the ADRs were rated arsenic decidedly avoidable. Three children received amoxicillin (two) and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, wherever signs and symptoms were emblematic of a viral illness. In 3 patients, vancomycin was started arsenic empiric therapy for meningitis contempt determination being nary objective grounds of staphylococcal disease. In 2 non-oncological patients with vomiting, metoclopramide was utilized arsenic first-line therapy and resulted successful dystonia. Ibuprofen was utilized for fever successful a dehydrated diligent with fever and vomiting and resulted successful acute renal failure. Convulsions occurred successful a diligent with acute asthma, who received a loading dose of aminophylline, contempt the kid having been connected oral aminophylline anterior to admission. We recovered that 1 kid who received intravenous calcium gluconate had extravasation of the cause causing section inflammation. Also, 1 diligent who received intravenous midazolam for convulsions had respiratory slump owed to the accelerated medication of the drug. Sixteen ADRs were deemed to beryllium perchance avoidable. Ten patients who received location nebulization with salbutamol developed tremors which could person been prevented by capable counselling. Nine patients connected furosemide developed hypokalaemia which could person been prevented by potassium supplementation. The full avoidable (possibly and decidedly avoidable) radical had 28 cases. Out of these 19 cases (67%) ADRs were of a mild type, and 9 cases were mean type. The benignant of absorption was benignant A successful 13 cases and benignant B successful 15 cases. On causality assessment, 8 cases of ADR were classified arsenic “certain,” 15 cases were classified arsenic “possible,” and 3 cases were classified arsenic “probable.”
Causality assessment (WHO-UMC strategy of causality assessment) | n (%) |
Certain | 43 (21.4 ) |
Probable | 139 (69.2 ) |
Possible | 14 (7.0 ) |
Unlikely | 5 (2.4 ) |
Unclassifiable | 0 ( 0.0) |
Type of absorption (n=182) | |
Type A - Augmented pharmacologic effect | 53 ( 29.1) |
Type B - Bizarre effect (idiosyncratic effect) | 114 ( 62.6) |
Type C - Chronic effect | 15 ( 8.2) |
Type D - Delayed effect | 0 ( 0) |
Type E - End of attraction effect | 0 (0 ) |
Severity of ADR (n=182) | |
Mild (Levels1 and 2) | 23 (12.6 ) |
Moderate (Levels 3 and 4) | 134 (73.6 ) |
Severe (Levels 5-7) | 25 (13.7 ) |
Avoidability (n=182) | |
Not avoidable | 154 (84.6 ) |
Definitely avoidable | 12 (6.6 ) |
Possibly avoidable | 16 ( 8.8) |
Anti-infectives were the astir communal radical liable for ADRs successful 79 admissions (43%), with antibiotics being the astir communal (34 of 79), i.e., 43%. Immunomodulators were liable for ADRs successful 29 admissions (16%). Drugs acting connected tense strategy were liable for ADRs successful 26 admissions (14%) with antiepileptics being the astir communal (18 of 26), i.e., 69%. ADRs associated with bronchodilators, diuretics, and NSAIDs were seen successful 11, 9 and 8 admissions, respectively. The astir communal ADRs were metabolic followed by neurological. Table 4 lists the antithetic organs affected by ADRs.
No. | System | n (%) |
1 | Metabolic | 55 (29.26) |
2 | Central and peripheral tense system | 33 (17.55) |
3 | Skin and appendages | 32 (17.02) |
4 | Gastro-intestinal, liver and biliary tract | 32 (17.02) |
5 | Haematologic | 25 (13.29) |
6 | Cardiovascular/Haemodynamic | 11 (5.85) |
Tables 5-7 database the assorted drugs and the associated ADRs.
No | Drug | n (%) | Type of adverse cause reaction |
1 | Ceftriaxone | 8 (4.3) | Anaphylaxis |
Biliary pseudolithiasis | |||
Rash | |||
Rigors | |||
2 | Amoxicillin-clavulinic acid | 6 (3.2) | Diarrhoea |
Rash | |||
Angio-neurotic oedema | |||
3 | Vancomycin | 5 (2.7) | Red antheral syndrome |
4 | Piperacillin-tazobactum | 3 (1.6) | Thrombocytopenia |
Hypokalaemia and metabolic alkalosis | |||
5 | Meropenem | 3 (1.6) | Hypokalaemia and metabolic alkalosis |
6 | Co-trimoxazole | 2 (1%) | Hypoglycaemia and convulsions |
Megaloblastic anaemia | |||
7 | Chroramphenicol | 2 (1%) | Pancytopenia |
8 | Amoxicillin | 1 (0.5) | Rash |
9 | Cefotaxime | 1 (0.5) | Rash |
10 | Cephalexin | 1 (0.5) | Rash |
11 | Ciprofloxacin | 1 (0.5) | Toxic epidermal necrolysis and death |
12 | Amikacin | 1 (0.5) | Acute renal failure |
No | Drug | n (%) | Type of adverse cause reaction |
I | Antimalarials | ||
Ia | Chloroquine phosphate | 8 (4.3) | Epigastric symptom and vomiting |
Rash | |||
Dystonia | |||
Ib | Clindamycin | 4 (2.1) | Rash |
Anaphylaxis | |||
Hyponatraemia | |||
Ic | Artesunate | 2 (1%) | Hyponatraemia owed to natriuresis |
II | Antifungals | ||
IIa | Amphotericin B | 9 (5) | Acute renal nonaccomplishment (elevated serum creatinine) |
Hypokalaemia | |||
Prolonged PR interval | |||
III | Antiretrovirals | ||
IIIa | Zidovudine | 4 (2.1) | Anaemia |
IIIb | Stavudine | 2 (1%) | Pancreatitis |
Lactic acidosis | |||
IIIc | Lamivudine | 1 (0.5) | Pancreatitis |
No | Drug | n (%) | Type of adverse cause reaction |
I | Antiepileptics | ||
Ia | Carbamazepine | 6 (3.2) | Drowsiness |
Hypocalcaemia | |||
Dystonia | |||
Ataxia | |||
Weight gain | |||
Ib | Phenytoin sodium | 5 (2.7) | Ataxia |
Nystagmus | |||
Gum hyperplasia | |||
Rash | |||
Ic | Phenobarbitone | 4 (2.1) | Ataxia |
Nystagmus | |||
Erythema multiforme | |||
Hypotension | |||
Id | Sodium valproate | 3 (1.6) | Hepatitis |
II | Anaesthetic agents | ||
IIa | Ketamine | 3 (1.6) | Fasciculations of tongue |
Vomiting | |||
Agitation during recovery | |||
III | Membrane stabilisers | ||
IIIa | Intravenous magnesium sulphate | 2 (1%) | Hypercalciuria and hypocalcaemia |
IV | Muscle relaxants | ||
IVa | Vecuronium | 1 (0.5) | Severe bradycardia and cardiac arrest |
IVb | Baclofen | 1 (0.5) | Acute flaccid paralysis |
Discussion
This prospective observational survey is 1 of the largest successful children successful India to measure causality, benignant of reaction, severity, avoidability, benignant of drug, and objective presentation. In our study, the wide incidence of ADRs was 3.02%. The incidence complaint for ADRs causing infirmary admittance was 1.79% (95% CI 1.48, 2.16), whereas it was 1.23% (95% CI 0.97, 1.53) for children exposed to a cause during their infirmary stay. Smyth et al. successful a systematic reappraisal of ADRs successful children gave a pooled estimation of the incidence complaint for ADRs causing infirmary admittance to beryllium 2.9% (95% CI 2.6, 3.1). For ADRs occurring successful hospitals, they recovered incidence rates ranging from 0.6% to 16.8% of patients [12]. Similar to different studies, we recovered nary property oregon enactment predisposition for ADRs. A majority, i.e., 114 of 182 (62.6%) of the ADRs were of the benignant B (bizarre oregon idiosyncratic type) whereas 53 of 182 (29.1%) were of benignant A (augmented pharmacologic effect). Type B ADRs were astir communal with anti-infectives (44) followed by drugs acting connected the tense strategy (23). Gallagher et al., however, recovered 238/249 (95.6%) of ADRs to beryllium of benignant A and 11/249 (4.4%) to beryllium of benignant B. Ninety-four of the type A ADRs were of definite causality with 80 of these 94 being related to oncology drugs [13]. Twenty-three of our 182 ADRs were of the mild variety, 41 were mean and 25 were severe. In contrast, Kurian et al. reporting from Mysore, India, recovered mild ADRs successful 82.5%, mean successful 17.18% and terrible successful none [14]. In our patients, mild ADRs were observed successful 23 patients, each of whom developed the absorption aft vulnerability to a cause successful the hospital. It is imaginable that those who presented with mild ADRs to the infirmary were dealt with connected an outpatient basis. Gallagher et al. recovered 223 of 249 patients to person ADRs of level 3 severity, 14 with level 4, 3 with level 5, and nary with level 6 [13].
In 28 of 182 patients, the ADRs were deemed avoidable with 12 being decidedly avoidable. Analysis of these ADRs successful our survey emphasizes the value of pursuing rational prescribing guidelines, improving monitoring for ADRs, expanding consciousness astir imaginable reactions of drugs, and spending clip connected diligent education. The bulk of the ADRs seen successful our survey were owed to anti-infectives (43.4%) followed by drugs acting connected the immune strategy (15.9%) and drugs acting connected the tense strategy (14.3%). Smyth et al. successful their systematic reappraisal of ADRs successful children recovered the proportions of ADRs owed to anti-infectives ranging from 3.5%-66.6% for “causing admission” studies (17 studies) and 8.6%-100% for “in hospital” studies (24 studies) [12]. Gallagher et al. from the UK recovered oncology-related drugs to beryllium the astir communal origin of ADRs (44.2%) [13]. The wide organisation of cause classes liable for ADRs successful children successful assorted settings astir apt reflects the benignant of admissions and the prescribing practices successful the institution.
In our study, the astir commonly observed ADRs were metabolic disturbances, followed by cardinal and peripheral tense strategy manifestations. Other authors person described gastrointestinal manifestations to beryllium the astir commonly observed ADRs, followed by dermatologic manifestations [14-16]. The astir communal metabolic disturbance seen was hypokalemia. In 9 patients, this was owed to furosemide. Eleven patients connected anti-infectives had hypokalemia, 7 of them owed to amphotericin B. Meropenem was liable successful 3 patients and piperacillin-tazobactam successful 1 patient. Patients connected diuretics and amphotericin are routinely monitored for hypokalemia. However, pediatricians should beryllium alert of this ADR with the β lactam radical of antibiotics since chronic hypokalemia whitethorn origin electrocardiographic changes and/or weaning nonaccomplishment successful the pediatric intensive attraction unit. The β lactam radical of antibiotics are non-absorbable anions that make an accrued trans-tubular imaginable quality astatine the distal tubule causing an summation not lone successful potassium secretion but besides hydrogen ion secretion resulting successful metabolic alkalosis and hypokalemia [17]. Meropenem causes metabolic alkalosis by the aforesaid mechanics owed to structural similarities [18]. Some rare ADRs were besides seen successful the people of this study. Common ADRs seen with chloroquine see gastrointestinal problems, headache, blurring of vision, and itching [19]. Dystonia was observed successful a diligent with confirmed uncomplicated vivax malaria aft a modular dose of oral chloroquine phosphate. Singhi et al. person besides described an extrapyramidal syndrome pursuing a modular dose of chloroquine [20]. Dystonia was besides seen successful a developmentally mean diligent with epilepsy connected therapeutic doses of carbamazepine. Dystonic reactions with therapeutic doses of carbamazepine person been described by different authors arsenic well [21,22]. Secondary dystonia is astir commonly owed to drugs with anti-dopaminergic properties specified arsenic archetypal and second-generation antipsychotics. Less often implicated are different cause classes similar anti-emetics specified arsenic metoclopramide. Co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole), a commonly prescribed antimicrobial is good tolerated successful astir patients. However, superior adverse events related to its usage person been described. Hypoglycemia is simply a uncommon but perchance life-threatening complication of therapy [23]. We study a diligent of AIDS, with prolonged hypoglycemia and seizures associated with co-trimoxazole, utilized for the attraction of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia. Serum creatinine successful our diligent was normal. In antecedently reported cases of co-trimoxazole-induced hypoglycemia, renal insufficiency was the astir prevalent predisposing hazard origin (93%). Serum insulin levels were elevated oregon inappropriately mean successful 88% of the patients successful which they were measured, suggesting a sulfonylurea-like effect of co-trimoxazole arsenic the mechanics of hypoglycemia [23]. Dosage adjustments should beryllium made erstwhile prescribing co-trimoxazole to patients with renal dysfunction.
The spot of this survey is that we person prospectively investigated ADRs successful children utilizing progressive hunt methods. This method facilitated the regular monitoring of patients by trained physicians. Also, specified prospective studies let greater detection of ADR arsenic compared to retrospective studies. Our survey has definite limitations. We person excluded neonates and pediatric surgical patients since they are admitted elsewhere successful the hospital and managed by antithetic departments. Studies person besides shown that familial factors play a relation in determining individual susceptibility to some dose-dependent and dose-independent ADRs. Some of these determinants include kinetic factors (gene polymorphisms successful cytochrome P450 enzymes), and dynamic factors (polymorphisms successful cause targets) [24]. We person not assessed these factors due to fiscal constraints. Some of the drug-ADR combinations listed successful Tables 5, 6 person debased numbers thereby mandating further large-scale pharmacovigilance studies in children. Currently, we bash not person an physics wellness grounds strategy successful our institution. Although this strategy tin measurement incidence rates of ADEs, it is not capable to observe preventable ADRs earlier diligent harm occurs. Newer methods involving machine monitors and physics triggers tin alteration researchers to drawback preventable ADRs and instrumentality corrective enactment [25].
Conclusions
In conclusion, we person shown that ADRs hap successful a tiny but important proportionality of hospitalized children. Some of these ADRs are superior and perchance avoidable. More attraction needs to beryllium fixed to bully prescribing practices to forestall avoidable ADRs. Active hunt portion taking objective ward rounds with a absorption connected circumstantial drugs associated with ADR tin summation the rates of detected reactions. Electronic wellness grounds systems arsenic sources of information for ADR detection. tin measurement incidence rates of ADRs but is not capable to observe preventable ADRs earlier diligent harm occurs. Finally, consciousness amongst physicians should beryllium encouraged regarding monitoring, documentation and notification of ADRs.
- Back HM, Lee JB, Han N, et al.: Application of size and maturation functions to colonisation pharmacokinetic modeling of pediatric patients. Pharmaceutics. 2019, 11:259. 10.3390/pharmaceutics11060259
- Khalil H, Huang C: Adverse cause reactions successful superior care: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020, 20:5. 10.1186/s12913-019-4651-7
- Ramos SF, Araújo-Neto FC, Aires-Moreno GT, de Araújo DC, Lima ED, de Lyra DP Jr: Causality and avoidability of adverse cause reactions of antibiotics successful hospitalized children: a cohort study. Int J Clin Pharm. 2021, 43:1293-301. 10.1007/s11096-021-01249-8
- Hazell L, Shakir SA: Under-reporting of adverse cause reactions: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2006, 29:385-96. 10.2165/00002018-200629050-00003
- Thota P, Thota A, Medhi B, Sidhu S, Kumar P, Selvan VK, Singh GN: Drug information alerts of pharmacovigilance programme of India: a scope for targeted spontaneous reporting successful India. Perspect Clin Res. 2018, 9:51-5. 10.4103/picr.PICR_29_17
- Tandon VR, Mahajan V, Khajuria V, Gillani Z: Under-reporting of adverse cause reactions: a situation for pharmacovigilance successful India. Indian J Pharmacol. 2015, 47:65-71. 10.4103/0253-7613.150344
- Edwards IR, Aronson JK: Adverse cause reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2000, 356:1255-9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02799-9
- The usage of the WHO-UMC strategy for standardised lawsuit causality assessment. WHO Collaborating Centre for International Drug Monitoring (Uppsala Monitoring Centre, UMC). Database. (2000). Accessed: December 19, 2022: http://who-umc.org/Graphics/24734.pdf.
- Rawlins MD, Thompson JW: Mechanisms of adverse cause reactions. . Textbook of Adverse Drug Reactions. Davies DM (ed): Oxford University Press, Oxford; 1991. 1111:2042-7158. 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1992.tb03605.x
- Hartwig SC, Siegel J, Schneider PJ: Preventability and severity appraisal successful reporting adverse cause reactions. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1992, 49:2229-32.
- Hallas J, Harvald B, Gram LF, Grodum E, Brøsen K, Haghfelt T, Damsbo N: Drug related infirmary admissions: the relation of definitions and strength of information collection, and the anticipation of prevention. J Intern Med. 1990, 228:83-90. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1990.tb00199.x
- Smyth RM, Gargon E, Kirkham J, Cresswell L, Golder S, Smyth R, Williamson P: Adverse cause reactions successful children--a systematic review. PLoS One. 2012, 7:e24061. 10.1371/journal.pone.0024061
- Gallagher RM, Mason JR, Bird KA, et al.: Adverse cause reactions causing admittance to a paediatric hospital. PLoS One. 2012, 7:e50127. 10.1371/journal.pone.0050127
- Kurian J, Mathew J, Sowjanya K, Chaitanya KR, Ramesh M, Sebastian J, Narayanappa D: Adverse cause reactions successful hospitalized pediatric patients: a prospective observational study. Indian J Pediatr. 2016, 83:414-9. 10.1007/s12098-015-2002-1
- Thiesen S, Conroy EJ, Bellis JR, et al.: Incidence, characteristics and hazard factors of adverse cause reactions successful hospitalized children - a prospective observational cohort survey of 6,601 admissions. BMC Med. 2013, 11:237. 10.1186/1741-7015-11-237
- Woo SD, Yoon J, Doo GE, et al.: Common causes and characteristics of adverse cause reactions successful older adults: a retrospective study. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2020, 21:87. 10.1186/s40360-020-00464-9
- Zaki SA, Lad V: Piperacillin-tazobactam-induced hypokalemia and metabolic alkalosis. Indian J Pharmacol. 2011, 43:609-10. 10.4103/0253-7613.84986
- Zaki SA, Shanbag P: Meropenem-induced hypokalemia and metabolic alkalosis. Indian J Pharmacol. 2012, 44:276-7. 10.4103/0253-7613.93872
- Braga CB, Martins AC, Cayotopa AD, et al.: Side effects of chloroquine and primaquine and grounds simplification successful malaria endemic country (Mâncio Lima, Acre, Brazil). Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2015, 2015:346853. 10.1155/2015/346853
- Singhi S, Singhi P, Singh M: Extrapyramidal syndrome pursuing chloroquine therapy. Indian J Pediatr. 1979, 46:58-60. 10.1007/BF02811499
- Bansal S, Gill M, Bhasin C: Carbamazepine-induced dystonia successful an adolescent. Indian J Pharmacol. 2016, 48:329-30. 10.4103/0253-7613.182879
- Critchley EM, Phillips M: Unusual idiosyncratic reactions to carbamazepine. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988, 51:1238. 10.1136/jnnp.51.9.1238
- Strevel EL, Kuper A, Gold WL: Severe and protracted hypoglycaemia associated with co-trimoxazole use. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006, 6:178-82. 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70414-5
- Pirmohamed M, Park BK: Genetic susceptibility to adverse cause reactions. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2001, 22:298-305. 10.1016/s0165-6147(00)01717-x
- Feng C, Le D, McCoy AB: Using physics wellness records to place adverse cause events successful ambulatory care: a systematic review. Appl Clin Inform. 2019, 10:123-8. 10.1055/s-0039-1677738