The American Academy of Emergency Medicine Physician Group (AAEM-PG) sued Envision Healthcare successful California, alleging that Envision’s usage of alleged “friendly PC” concern structures violates California’s laws regarding the firm signifier of medicine (CPOM). The suit, which is acceptable for proceedings successful January 2024, has important imaginable implications for doc signifier absorption (PPM) companies and backstage equity sponsors that person invested heavy successful PPMs and doc groups.
At slightest 30 states, including California, person enacted immoderate signifier of CPOM restriction. CPOM laws are mostly intended to forestall unlicensed persons oregon entities from employing physicians oregon controlling the signifier of medicine. The restrictions instrumentality galore antithetic forms and alteration importantly from authorities to state. States with CPOM laws mostly necessitate that each of the owners of a doc signifier entity indispensable beryllium licensed to signifier medicine, taxable to definite constricted exceptions. As a result, backstage equity sponsors and different unlicensed investors mostly cannot ain the equity of a doc practice.
In bid to facilitate concern successful doc practices, backstage equity sponsors and different investors typically usage what is known arsenic a “friendly PC” structure. Under a modular affable PC structure, the investors ain equity successful a absorption services enactment (MSO) that purchases the nonclinical assets of the nonrecreational corp (PC) that operates the practice. The PC retains each objective assets and continues to employment the physicians. The MSO past enters into a semipermanent absorption statement with the PC that provides for the MSO to execute nonclinical administrative services for the PC successful speech for a absorption fee. Management agreements typically supply for the PC and its physicians to person sole and exclusive authorization implicit objective decisions and the signifier of medicine. The MSO besides mostly enters into an equity transportation regularisation statement with the physician-owners of the PC, pursuant to which the MSO tin necessitate the physician-owners to transportation ownership to a doc designated by the MSO upon the occurrence of definite triggering events.
In the suit, AAEM-PG argues that Envision’s usage of affable PC arrangements constitutes amerciable power implicit the signifier of medicine by its managed aesculapian groups successful usurpation of California’s CPOM laws. Advocates for PPMs person defended the affable PC model, arguing that it facilitates indispensable investments successful doc practices that are facing accrued outgo pressures and allows physicians to absorption connected practicing medicine without being distracted by administrative matters.
AAEM-PG initially filed the suit successful December 2021, but the suit has gained important attraction pursuing a communicative published past period by Kaiser Health News successful which David Millstein, pb lawyer for AAEM-PG, was quoted arsenic saying “We are simply asking the tribunal to prohibition this signifier model.” A determination successful AAEM-PG’s favour could necessitate PPMs operating successful California to acquisition a important restructuring to comply with the court’s mentation of California’s CPOM laws. The result of the lawsuit could besides pb to CPOM challenges oregon caller authorities successful different states. King & Spalding has received respective inquiries from funny clients regarding the imaginable interaction of this lawsuit and we are monitoring the developments closely. If you person immoderate questions, delight interaction Tom Hawk oregon Gardner Armsby.
The lawsuit is American Academy of Emergency Medicine Physician Group, Inc. v. Envision Healthcare Corporation et al, Case No. 3:22-cv-00421 (N.D. Cal.).
English (US)