Feds use rare veto to block Alaska copper, gold mine plan - The Associated Press - en Español

1 year ago 52

JUNEAU, Alaska (AP) — The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency took an unusually beardown measurement Tuesday successful blocking a projected excavation heralded by backers arsenic the astir important undeveloped copper and golden assets successful the world, with the bureau citing arsenic unacceptable impacts the task could person connected a affluent Alaska aquatic ecosystem that supports the world’s largest sockeye salmon fishery.

The move, cheered by Alaska Native tribes and environmentalists and condemned by immoderate authorities officials and mining interests, deals a dense stroke to the projected Pebble Mine. The intended tract is successful a distant country of southwest Alaska’s Bristol Bay region, astir 200 miles (322 kilometers) southwest of Anchorage.

It’s accessible lone by chopper and snowmobile successful winter, developer Pebble Limited Partnership said successful a licence exertion with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. As proposed, it called for a mining complaint of up to 73 cardinal tons a year.

An entreaty by the Pebble concern of a abstracted rejection of a key national licence is unresolved.

In a statement, Pebble Limited Partnership CEO John Shively called the EPA’s enactment “unlawful” and governmental and said litigation was likely. Shively has formed the task arsenic cardinal to the Biden administration’s propulsion to scope greenish vigor goals and marque the U.S. little babelike connected overseas nations for specified minerals.

The Pebble Limited Partnership is owned Canada-based Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.

The Pebble deposit is adjacent the headwaters of the Bristol Bay watershed, which supports a bounty of salmon “unrivaled anyplace successful North America,” according to the EPA.

Tuesday’s announcement marks lone the 14th clip successful the astir 50-year past of the national Clean Water Act that the EPA has flexed its powers to barroom oregon restrict activities implicit their imaginable interaction connected waters, including fisheries. EPA Administrator Michael Regan said his agency’s usage of its alleged veto authorization successful this lawsuit “underscores the existent irreplaceable and invaluable earthy wonderment that is Bristol Bay.”

The veto is simply a triumph for the environment, system and tribes of Alaska’s Bristol Bay region, which person fought the connection for much than a decade, said Joel Reynolds, occidental manager and elder lawyer with the Natural Resources Defense Council.

The excavation would person jeopardized the region’s salmon fishery, which brings 15,000 jobs to the country and supplies astir fractional the world’s sockeye salmon, Reynolds said. The 2022 harvest was much than 60 cardinal fish, authorities officials reported past year.

“It’s a triumph for subject implicit politics. For biodiversity implicit extinction. For ideology implicit firm power,” Reynolds said.

The EPA, citing an investigation by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, said discharges of dredged oregon capable worldly to physique and run the projected excavation tract would effect successful a nonaccomplishment of astir 100 miles (160 kilometers) of watercourse habitat, arsenic good arsenic wetlands.

The Pebble concern has maintained the task tin coexist with salmon. The partnership’s website says the deposit is astatine the precocious reaches of 3 “very tiny tributaries” and expresses assurance immoderate impacts connected the fishery “in the improbable lawsuit of an incident” would beryllium “minimal.”

Republican Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy said the EPA’s veto was a unsafe precedent that could impact aboriginal improvement successful the state, portion authorities Attorney General Treg Taylor said the agency’s enactment was “legally indefensible.”

“Alarmingly, it lays the instauration to halt immoderate improvement project, mining oregon non-mining, successful immoderate country of Alaska with wetlands and fish-bearing streams,” Dunleavy said.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski, an Alaska Republican, said she opposed the excavation but said the EPA’s veto shouldn’t beryllium allowed to jeopardize aboriginal mining operations successful the state.

“To beryllium clear: I reason Pebble. To beryllium arsenic clear: I enactment liable mining successful Alaska, which is simply a nationalist imperative. This determination indispensable not service arsenic precedent to people immoderate different task successful our authorities and indispensable beryllium the lone clip EPA ever uses its veto authorization nether the Clean Water Act successful Alaska,” Murkowski said successful a statement.

Sen. Maria Cantwell, a Washington Democrat, called the EPA’s actions “the last nail successful the coffin for the Pebble Mine” and the culmination of a hard fought battle.

“Now, we volition person a thriving Bristol Bay salmon tally for generations to come,” she said.

Tribes successful the Bristol Bay portion successful 2010 petitioned the EPA to support the country nether the national Clean Water Act. Alannah Hurley, enforcement manager of United Tribes of Bristol Bay, said that to telephone the EPA announcement “welcome quality is an understatement.”

Tim Bristol, enforcement manager with the radical SalmonState, lauded the EPA’s decision, saying it “may beryllium the astir fashionable happening the national authorities has ever done for Alaska.”

The EPA’s determination is the latest successful a years-long back-and-forth implicit the task that has spanned administrations.

Leila Kimbrell, enforcement manager for the Resource Development Council for Alaska Inc., called the EPA’s determination “a unsafe maltreatment of powerfulness and national overreach.” The National Mining Association, citing precocious request for minerals and fragile planetary proviso chains, said home mining has “never been much important.” It said EPA’s determination is “in stark opposition to nationalist and planetary realities.”

___

Whittle reported from Portland, Maine.

Read Entire Article