UPDATE: Microsoft responds.
UPDATE 8pm: Microsoft has responded to the FTC's announcement of a suit to artifact its $69bn acquisition of Activision Blizzard.
"We proceed to judge that this woody volition grow contention and make much opportunities for gamers and crippled developers," Microsoft's vice seat and president Brad Smith said successful a statement. "We person been committed since Day One to addressing contention concerns, including by offering earlier this week projected concessions to the FTC."
"While we believed successful giving bid a chance," Smith concluded, "we person implicit assurance successful our lawsuit and invited the accidental to contiguous our lawsuit successful court.”
ORIGINAL STORY 7.30pm: The United States government's Federal Trade Commission is suing to artifact Microsoft's $69bn USD acquisition of Activision Blizzard, claiming the woody would let the institution to suppress its games manufacture competition.
In a quality merchandise announcing the lawsuit, the FTC pointed to Microsoft's acquisition of ZeniMax successful 2021, and the company's consequent determination to marque games from its subsidiaries - namely Bethesda's Starfield and Redfall - exclusive to Microsoft devices, contempt antecedently assuring European regulators it had nary inducement to withhold games from rival consoles.
"Microsoft has already shown that it tin and volition withhold contented from its gaming rivals," the FTC's manager of bureau contention Holly Vedova said successful a statement. "Today we question to halt Microsoft from gaining power implicit a starring autarkic crippled workplace and utilizing it to harm contention successful aggregate dynamic and fast-growing gaming markets."
The FTC goes connected to accidental Activision Blizzard is "one of lone a precise tiny fig of apical video crippled developers successful the satellite that make and people high-quality video games for aggregate devices", earlier noting the publisher's titles - which see the likes of Call of Duty, Overwatch, and World of Warcraft - presently pull 154 cardinal monthly progressive users betwixt them.
"But that could alteration if the woody is allowed to proceed," the FTC's connection continues. "With power implicit Activision's blockbuster franchises, Microsoft would person some the means and motive to harm contention by manipulating Activision's pricing, degrading Activision's crippled prime oregon subordinate acquisition connected rival consoles and gaming services, changing the presumption and timing of entree to Activision's content, oregon withholding contented from competitors entirely, resulting successful harm to consumers."
A report by the Washington Post expands connected the FTC's arguments, saying its suit adds the Activision Blizzard woody would springiness Microsoft an unfair vantage - and dampen innovation - successful areas specified arsenic gaming subscription services and unreality gaming.
The FTC is the archetypal regulator to effort to artifact Microsoft's acquisition of Activision Blizzard; respective different countries, including Saudi Arabia and Brazil, person already approved the deal.
However, the acquisition presently remains nether adjacent scrutiny successful some the UK and Europe, wherever each regulatory assemblage is independently acceptable to denote the findings of a much "in-depth" signifier 2 reappraisal of the connection aboriginal adjacent year.
Today's announcement follows last-ditch efforts by Microsoft to assuage regulatory fears astir its acquisition, with the institution earlier this week announcing it had agreed a 10-year woody to bring Call of Duty to Nintendo consoles if its buyout went through. It was besides reported to person offered the aforesaid committedness to PlayStation, though Sony was said to beryllium "as excited astir this woody arsenic Blockbuster was astir the emergence of Netflix".
On Monday, the New York Post claimed the FTC had softened its stance connected blocking Microsoft's projected acquisition of Activision Blizzard and that the woody was present looking much apt to pass. This, clearly, wasn't the case.