How bad is the video passthrough on the Quest Pro? - MIXED Reality News

1 year ago 72
How atrocious  is the video passthrough connected  the Quest Pro?

Image: Karl Guttag (KGonTech)

That the Meta Quest Pro’s passthrough is atrocious is communal knowledge. Now we cognize precisely however bad.

Industry seasoned and show adept Karl Guttag enactment the Meta Quest Pro’s video passthrough to the test. For much than a month, helium took photos and videos to seizure a wide assortment of ocular aspects. Guttag published the archetypal extended portion of his investigation connected his blog KGonTech – and his conclusions are devastating.

With Meta Quest Pro, you’re practically blind

Guttag captured the assorted images and videos with a Canon R5 done the near lens of the VR headset. He contrasts these with accepted footage from the nonrecreational camera, which is reportedly rather close to quality vision. Subjected to a imaginativeness test, users of a Quest Pro are astir blind oregon severely visually impaired portion utilizing passthrough.

 Eine Sehprobentafel, einmal durch Meta Quest Pro gesehen, einmal mit Canon R5 aufgenommen.

The Meta Quest Pro’s Passthrough fails the imaginativeness trial and comes successful betwixt 10/200 (“visually impaired”) and 20/200 (“legally blind”). | Image: Karl Guttag (KGonTech)

Guttag besides noted mediocre colour reproduction, a debased opposition range, beardown distortions, a debased framework rate, and trailing colour fringes, among different things. In different words, video viewing does not travel adjacent to earthy quality vision.

Video passthrough: “Not harmless and bully capable for mixed reality”

While the passthrough is simply a large betterment implicit Meta Quest 2 (review), it’s nowhere adjacent bully enough for a due mixed world device, Guttag writes successful his conclusion. The passthrough presumption is truthful atrocious that helium wonders wherefore the Meta Quest Pro (review) is advertised for applications similar enactment and productivity. Guttag says the instrumentality volition hardly ever beryllium safer to usage than VR, adjacent pending important bundle updates.

Eine Auflistung von Vor- und Nachteilen der Passthrough-Technik.

Advantages and disadvantages of passthrough exertion compared to AR headsets with transparent optics, specified arsenic Hololens 2 and Magic Leap 2. | Image: Karl Guttag (KGonTech)

One could antagonistic the show adept that passthrough exertion is inactive comparatively new. Or, the effort to accurately reconstruct the situation utilizing cameras and AI algorithms is comparatively new. Devices similar the Varjo XR-3 (review), Meta Quest Pro, and Lynx-R1 (info) are the archetypal steps successful this absorption and by nary means their completion.

For $1,500 you should expect a instrumentality that tin work substance from a smartphone oregon screen. Meta Quest Pro tin lone bash that to a constricted extent.

<?php if (!get_locale() === 'de_DE') instrumentality ?>

logo

  • checkKündigung jederzeit online möglich

ab 2,80 € / Monat

Passthrough AR brings caller challenges and hurdles

Guttag talked astir the pros and cons of video passthrough successful item with Youtuber Brad Lynch past summertime (see video below). Natural video rendering of the situation includes much than resolution, contrast, colour fidelity, and representation sharpness. There are adjacent much hard method issues to solve, specified arsenic progressive imaginativeness and distortion.

At the caller Siggraph conference, Meta presented a paper successful which researchers shed airy connected the assorted challenges and presented a solution for artificial imaginativeness synthesis. However, convincing passthrough is inactive a agelong mode off, particularly successful the self-sufficient signifier factor, the researchers conclude.

Note: Links to online stores successful articles tin beryllium alleged affiliate links. If you bargain done this link, MIXED receives a committee from the provider. For you the terms does not change.

Read Entire Article