Judge dismisses Meadows lawsuit against Jan. 6 committee - POLITICO

Meadows is apt to entreaty the ruling, efficaciously putting his grounds retired of scope for the Jan. 6 prime committee, which is slated to dissolve astatine the extremity of the year. Meadows’ attorney, George Terwilliger, said: “We volition reappraisal the determination cautiously and see immoderate further steps that whitethorn beryllium appropriate.’'

The ruling, nevertheless could person implications for galore of the different suits filed against the Jan. 6 committee by Trump allies — galore of which person likewise landed successful Nichols’ court.

It’s a important triumph for the prime committee, but successful immoderate ways it’s a hollow one. The sheet repeatedly told Nichols it had chosen not to asseverate its “speech oregon debate” immunity and wanted the justice — a Donald Trump appointee — to contented a much sweeping ruling connected Trump’s efforts to asseverate enforcement privilege implicit Meadows’ testimony. A ruling successful the committee’s favour would person been an exclamation constituent successful its 14-month investigation, underscoring the panel’s urgent request to perceive from Meadows, a cardinal fig successful Trump’s effort to subvert the 2020 election.

The sheet has been seeking Meadows’ grounds since September 2021, saying its grounds showed Meadows was a cardinal subordinate successful astir each facet of Trump’s strategy to prehend a 2nd word helium didn’t win. Meadows was progressive successful efforts to stoke distrust astir the predetermination results, coordinating with Trump’s run astir messaging and serving arsenic a gatekeeper for immoderate of Trump’s extracurricular advisers. He was connected a Jan. 4, 2021, telephone telephone successful which Trump urged Georgia predetermination officials to “find” capable votes to assistance him win. And helium was with Trump connected Jan. 6, 2021, erstwhile rioters breached the Capitol, and Trump waited hours to marque a nationalist statement, contempt urgent pleas from allies and lawmakers.

Nichols acknowledged the weighty intent of the prime committee’s investigation, but helium took contented with the panel’s tactics successful the lawsuit.

For example, Nichols noted that if the committee got a ruling it didn’t similar from him, it could simply take to rise “speech oregon debate” issues astatine the appeals court.

“Such an result could origin a important discarded of clip and resources, particularly considering the caller law questions that this lawsuit presents connected the merits,” Nichols noted.

Nichols had foreshadowed his frustration with the committee’s attack during a Sept. 7 proceeding connected the matter, noting that the committee had asserted “speech oregon debate” immunity successful galore Jan. 6-related lawsuits.

Meadows contended successful his suit that helium was immune from legislature subpoenas arsenic a subordinate of Trump’s interior circle, which meant ample swaths of his imaginable grounds were covered by enforcement privilege. In fact, Trump had encouraged Meadows to asseverate enforcement privilege and sought to artifact him and different apical aides from providing invaluable grounds to the committee.

But the prime committee rejected this premise, contending that Trump, arsenic a erstwhile president, had nary ground for shielding Meadows’ testimony, peculiarly aft incumbent President Joe Biden had waived immoderate privilege claims Meadows was attempting to raise. Even if Trump had the quality to asseverate privilege, the sheet contended that its request for Meadows’ grounds was easy large capable to flooded that assertion.

But Nichols said adjacent with the House’s effort to skirt “speech oregon debate” immunity — a presumption with which Meadows mostly agreed — the justice said helium was required to see it. He compared “speech oregon debate” immunity to overseas sovereign immunity, noting that courts volition disregard matters connected that ground adjacent erstwhile it’s not asserted by litigants.

The justice said without an explicit waiver from the House members involved, the law immunity applied to the lawsuit and required the dismissal of Meadows’ suit.

Nicholas Wu and Josh Gerstein contributed to this report.