Affirmative enactment advocates rally extracurricular the U.S. Supreme Court arsenic justices heard oral arguments connected 2 cases connected whether colleges and universities tin proceed to see contention arsenic a origin successful admissions decisions connected Oct. 31, 2022. | Francis Chung/E&E News/POLITICO
A bulk of the justices sounded inclined to further restrict the usage of contention successful assemblage admissions during arguments successful the archetypal of 2 precocious illustration cases astatine the Supreme Court Monday.
Students for Fair Admissions, led by longtime affirmative enactment hostile Edward Blum, is challenging race-conscious admissions practices astatine Harvard University and the University of North Carolina astatine Chapel Hill.
SFFA wants justices to overturn its ruling successful Grutter v. Bollinger, a 2003 landmark determination that held colleges tin see contention and usage holistic reviews arsenic agelong arsenic their affirmative enactment programs are narrowly tailored. Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, who wrote the 2003 opinion, had said the tribunal expected the usage of radical preferences would nary longer beryllium indispensable successful 25 years.
“When does it end; When is your sunset?” Justice Amy Coney Barrett asked, pressing North Carolina Solicitor General Ryan Park who is defending UNC. “Grutter doesn’t say, ‘This is great, we clasp this.’ Grutter says this is dangerous, and it has to person an endpoint.”
The cases are immoderate of the most-watched of the word arsenic SFFA urges the precocious tribunal to onslaught down decades of precedent that person allowed colleges to usage contention and holistic reviews arsenic a origin successful admissions.
English (US)