Oath Keepers Founder Stewart Rhodes Takes The Stand In Capitol Riot Trial - The Daily Beast

2 years ago 45

Stewart Rhodes, the laminitis of the Oath Keepers, took the basal successful his ain defence connected Friday successful the astir important proceedings yet implicit the Jan. 6 insurrection. Suffice it to accidental helium did not backmost down from spreading deranged conspiracies astir the 2020 election that helped substance deadly violence—though helium appeared to stumble on the way.

“I’m bully to go,” Rhodes said successful D.C. national court, earlier launching into his idiosyncratic past and his determination to commencement the far-right militia group.

His determination to attest comes aft prosecutors spent weeks arguing that Rhodes and his chap Oath Keepers spent months readying “an equipped rebellion to shatter a bedrock of American democracy” successful a vain effort to halt the certification of President Joe Biden’s triumph implicit Donald Trump successful the 2020 election.

Rhodes and 4 different members person pleaded not blameworthy to seditious conspiracy, a rare, Civil War-era complaint that carries a maximum condemnation of 20 years successful prison. On Friday, Rhodes confirmed that helium was unhappy with the predetermination and believed that it was “unconstitutional.”

“That made it invalid,” helium said. “And you truly can’t person a victor of an unconstitutional election.”

“That would mean that Donald Trump, too, was not the winner,” Rhodes added.

Prosecutors allege that the program to disrupt ideology began conscionable days aft Biden was declared the victor of the 2020 statesmanlike election. For months, Oath Keepers allegedly trained, discussed the request to spell to war, and adjacent stockpiled weapons that would beryllium held extracurricular of the D.C. country connected Jan. 6 successful lawsuit Trump invoked the Insurrection Act.

“Their extremity was to halt by immoderate means indispensable the lawful transportation of statesmanlike power, including by taking up arms against the United States government,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Nestler said during opening statements. “They did not spell to the Capitol to support oregon help; they went to attack.”

For weeks, prosecutors person been showing jurors substance messages, audio recordings, and surveillance footage to show the lengths the Oath Keepers allegedly went to execute their plan. On Wednesday, jurors were played a signaling of Rhodes 4 days aft the insurrection—where helium is heard admitting his lone regret was not bringing rifles to the Capitol.

“We could person fixed it close past and there. I’d bent fuckin’ Pelosi from the lamppost,” Rhodes said.

Defense attorneys for the 5 individuals importune that the radical committed nary transgression astatine the Capitol—and that Rhodes did not adjacent participate the building. Standing proceedings with Rhodes is Kelly Meggs, a person of the Florida Oath Keepers chapter; Thomas Caldwell, a retired Navy quality officer; subordinate Kenneth Harrelson; and Jessica Watkins, who led an Ohio militia group.

Federal authorities person described the Oath Keepers radical arsenic “a ample but loosely organized postulation of [the] militia who judge that the national authorities has been co-opted by a shadowy conspiracy that is trying to portion American citizens of their rights” and who heavy enlistee erstwhile military, instrumentality enforcement, and archetypal responders.

Rhodes connected Friday gave jurors respective reasons wherefore helium founded the Oath Keepers—ranging from his choler implicit the George W. Bush epoch to helping veterans larn they bash not person to blindly obey the Constitution.

“I wanted to marque definite they knew wherever the lines were and their work to accidental no,” helium said.

Describing the intended relation of the group, Rhodes denied characterizations that the Oath Keepers are extremist—insisting that his members simply privation to enactment demonstrations.

Then helium seemed to gaffe up.

“I enactment the close to riot,” Rhodes said, earlier adjusting his phrasing: “I enactment the close to protest.”

Read Entire Article