Quick Update. Samsung's Galaxy A13 4G is present besides disposable with a MediaTek SoC that not lone provides much powerfulness but besides changes different insignificant details of Samsung's inexpensive smartphone. That is capable crushed for america to instrumentality a person look astatine the caller mentation successful our review.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Anton Avdyushkin (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 11/07/2022 🇩🇪
Display
6.60 inch 20:9, 2408 x 1800 pixel 456 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, PLS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB
, 54 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD slot (dedicated, up to 1TB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: compass, acceleration, virtual brightness sensor, virtual proximity sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x extent (in mm): 8.8 x 165.1 x 76.4 ( = 0.35 x 6.5 x 3.01 in)
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 15 Watt accelerated charging
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/1.8, signifier comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/30fps (Camera 1); 5.0MP, f/2.2, wide space lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/2.4, macro lens (Camera 3); 2.0MP, f/2.4, extent of tract (Camera 4)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.2
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.353W/kg (head), 1.224W/kg (body), fanless
Weight
195 g ( = 6.88 oz / 0.43 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Note: The shaper whitethorn usage components from antithetic suppliers including show panels, drives oregon representation sticks with akin specifications.
| 77.3 % | 11/2022 | Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2 | 195 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1800 | |
| 76.5 % | 05/2022 | Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1 | 195 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 | |
| 74.4 % | 09/2022 | Xiaomi Poco C40 JR510, Mali-G52 MP1 | 204 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.71" | 1650x720 | |
| 75.1 % | 05/2022 | Motorola Moto G22 Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320 | 185 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 |
It is not antithetic for Samsung to merchandise a caller mentation of a smartphone aft a fewer months. This usually arrives with a antithetic SoC. In this case, the Galaxy A13 4G New Edition with the exemplary fig A137F present has a MediaTek processor.
The Korean selling section describes the casing arsenic "minimalistic with a batch of style", which euphemistically stands for precise simple, glossy plastic. The chassis successful black, white, oregon airy bluish is susceptible to fingerprints, but it is rather unchangeable and hardly allows unit to scope the display.
The archetypal Galaxy A13 4G variant has the aforesaid casing, and thing has changed successful presumption of dimensions oregon weight.
Samsung offers 3 configuration variants. The entry-level exemplary with 32 GB of wide retention besides lone offers 3 GB of RAM. The better-equipped models with 64 and 128 GB of wide retention each person 4 GB of moving memory. We tested the 64 GB variant.
We similar the information that Samsung uses USB-C contempt the debased terms and besides installs an NFC module truthful that mobile outgo services tin beryllium used, for example.
The microSD scholar is abstracted from the 2 SIM slots. We tested the reader's velocity with our Angelbird V60 notation card, and the A137F was marginally slower than the archetypal successful the transcript trial Galaxy A13 4G. In the CPDT benchmark, connected the different hand, the telephone is faster but brings somewhat inconsistent values. The perceived velocity of the paper scholar should beryllium connected a akin level successful mundane use.
Xiaomi Poco C40 Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Motorola Moto G22 ❌
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36.1 (18.4-50)
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø30.8 (17.6-38.8)
Xiaomi Poco C40 Mali-G52 MP1, JR510, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34.6 (25.1-45)
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø35.9 (20.7-46.1)
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø72.7 (46.8-80.1)
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø50 (37.9-54.4)
Xiaomi Poco C40 Mali-G52 MP1, JR510, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø68.2 (48.1-73.5)
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø72.5 (27.9-75.8)
There is small alteration successful presumption of Wi-Fi speed: the New Edition besides features Wi-Fi 5 arsenic the fastest standard, delivers rather unchangeable transportation rates, and is likewise accelerated connected Wi-Fi arsenic the archetypal Galaxy A13 4G and different phones successful the terms range.
Although the caller SoC would really enactment much LTE bands, the caller Galaxy A13 besides lone communicates with the astir indispensable bands to beryllium capable to run it successful Europe. Thus, arsenic soon arsenic you question to different countries, you person to instrumentality a adjacent look astatine whether the indispensable frequencies for mobile Internet are supported.
Samsung again installs OneUI 4 based connected Android 12. The information updates are from October 2022 astatine the clip of investigating and frankincense comparatively up-to-date. An update to Android 13 has besides been announced.
The telephone tin beryllium operated rather smoothly contempt the 60 Hz surface and feels adjacent much responsive with the caller SoC. The telephone tin beryllium unlocked via the fingerprint sensor successful the standby fastener connected the close broadside of the casing. This is not 100% reliable, but it works astir of the clip and is besides rather fast.
Face designation via the front-facing camera is besides available, and it besides works satisfactorily successful bully lighting conditions.
; iperf3 person AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø305 (282-324)
; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø369 (321-376)
Photo from the beforehand cameraAgain, thing has changed compared to the predecessor: arsenic successful galore inexpensive Samsung phones, the in-house Isocell JN1 sensor is utilized arsenic the main camera. It has a maximum solution of 50 megapixels, but usually lone takes pictures with a 4th of it, though with larger and much light-sensitive pixels.
The camera shows mediocre representation sharpness but offers a decent equilibrium successful dynamics, particularly successful debased light. For its inexpensive terms range, the main camera does not bash a atrocious occupation astatine all.
Even a wide-angle lens is installed successful the Galaxy A13 4G New Edition, but it has a alternatively debased solution similar its sister model. It is capable for bully snapshots, but it does not conscionable higher demands.
The front-facing camera with 8 megapixels could usage a spot much airy sensitivity, but it takes decent selfies successful bully lighting conditions. However, determination is hardly immoderate drafting successful acheronian areas.
Image Comparison
Choose a country and navigate wrong the archetypal image. One click changes the presumption connected touchscreens. One click connected the zoomed-in representation opens the archetypal successful a caller window. The archetypal representation shows the scaled photograph of the trial device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow LightUltra wide-angle
click to load images
17.7 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
14 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
13 ∆E
12 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
52.7 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
60.2 ∆E
52 ∆E
36 ∆E
41.3 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
62.2 ∆E
61.6 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
35.8 ∆E
71.8 ∆E
42.8 ∆E
44 ∆E
79.4 ∆E
68.6 ∆E
50.5 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
Subpixel structureThe show shows flimsy differences betwixt the 2 models, adjacent though the specs of the PLS surface with 2,408 x1,080 pixels and 60 Hz sheet dependable the aforesaid astatine the start.
However, the caller exemplary doesn't rather scope the luminosity of the Galaxy A13 4G with Exynos SoC. The 453 cd/m² is not a atrocious value, but inactive importantly little than the predecessor.
Again, nary PWM is utilized to dim the screen. Sensitive radical should truthful beryllium capable to usage the show without immoderate problems.
| 445 cd/m² | 478 cd/m² | 439 cd/m² | ||
| 427 cd/m² | 492 cd/m² | 455 cd/m² | ||
| 440 cd/m² | 472 cd/m² | 429 cd/m² | ||
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 492 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 453 cd/m² Minimum: 3.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center connected Battery: 492 cd/m²
Contrast: 1330:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.34 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.398
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39 ?(13, 16) | 47 ?(27, 20) -21% | 40 ?(23, 17) -3% | 46 ?(25, 21) -18% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 33 ?(15, 18) | 20 ?(9, 11) 39% | 28 ?(13, 15) 15% | 34 ?(19, 15) -3% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||
| Brightness middle | 492 | 553 12% | 468 -5% | 451 -8% |
| Brightness | 453 | 506 12% | 450 -1% | 431 -5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 87 0% | 92 6% | 90 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.44 -19% | 0.4 -8% | 0.5 -35% |
| Contrast | 1330 | 1257 -5% | 1170 -12% | 902 -32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.34 | 4.64 -7% | 4.53 -4% | 5.82 -34% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.94 | 7.86 -32% | 8.96 -51% | 9.3 -57% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 5.6 -19% | 6.5 -38% | 5 -6% |
| Gamma | 2.398 92% | 2.18 101% | 2.191 100% | 2.776 79% |
| CCT | 7668 85% | 8002 81% | 8122 80% | 7683 85% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display effect times amusement however accelerated the surface is capable to alteration from 1 colour to the next. Slow effect times tin pb to afterimages and tin origin moving objects to look blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should wage peculiar attraction to accelerated effect times.
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, immoderate notebooks volition simply rhythm the backlight connected and disconnected successful accelerated succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequence should ideally beryllium undetectable to the quality eye. If said frequence is excessively low, users with delicate eyes whitethorn acquisition strain oregon headaches oregon adjacent announcement the flickering altogether.
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of each tested devices bash not usage PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an mean of 19727 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
The biggest quality betwixt the 2 A13 4G models is seen successful the performance: the Helio G80 of the New Edition offers considerably much powerfulness successful our benchmarks and besides stands retired compared to different devices successful the terms range.
The faster processor besides ensures a smoother acquisition successful mundane use, whether browsing the Internet, successful menus, oregon successful apps. The information retention is inactive slow, but determination are lone a fewer smartphones that connection faster retention modules successful this terms range.
Heating up nether a longer load is noticeable astatine country temperature, but not unpleasant. The Galaxy A13 4G with MediaTek SoC tin support its afloat show adjacent nether a agelong load.
The mono talker connected the little borderline is treble-heavy and lacks a batch of richness, but astatine slightest reproduces code well. However, we would urge headphones for music. The caller SoC offers a 3.5 mm audio larboard arsenic good arsenic a much modern Bluetooth 5.2. The codec assortment is besides precise constricted successful the New Edition.
Again, determination is simply a 5,000 mAh battery, which offers bully runtimes that are adjacent somewhat higher than those of the Galaxy A13 4G with Exynos SoC successful our WLAN test. Just nether 15 hours should beryllium capable for an intensive workday and adjacent 2 days without a powerfulness outlet are imaginable with mean use. Although the SoC would enactment higher charging speeds, a maximum of 15 watts is possible, and a charger is not included successful the New Edition either.
| Average of class Smartphone (58 - 1885, n=264, past 2 years) | 726 Points ∼100% +142% |
| Average Mediatek Helio G80 (300 - 387, n=10) | 360 Points ∼50% +20% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096 | 300 Points ∼41% |
| Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096 | 172 Points ∼24% -43% |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 JLQ JR510, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072 | 164 Points ∼23% -45% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096 | 155 Points ∼21% -48% |
| Average of class Smartphone (248 - 5538, n=264, past 2 years) | 2338 Points ∼100% +196% |
| Average Mediatek Helio G80 (790 - 1370, n=10) | 1273 Points ∼54% +61% |
| Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096 | 947 Points ∼41% +20% |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 JLQ JR510, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072 | 818 Points ∼35% +4% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096 | 790 Points ∼34% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096 | 586 Points ∼25% -26% |
| Average of class Smartphone (4436 - 19200, n=206, past 2 years) | 10316 Points ∼100% +85% |
| Average Mediatek Helio G80 (5589 - 8120, n=8) | 6389 Points ∼62% +14% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096 | 5589 Points ∼54% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096 | 4966 Points ∼48% -11% |
| Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096 | 4922 Points ∼48% -12% |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 JLQ JR510, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072 | 4780 Points ∼46% -14% |
| Average of class Smartphone (78 - 7614, n=157, past 2 years) | 2187 Points ∼100% +65% |
| Average Mediatek Helio G80 (1319 - 1384, n=9) | 1350 Points ∼62% +2% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096 | 1329 Points ∼61% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096 | 888 Points ∼41% -33% |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 JLQ JR510, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072 | 607 Points ∼28% -54% |
| Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096 | 453 Points ∼21% -66% |
| Average of class Smartphone (62 - 9978, n=157, past 2 years) | 2164 Points ∼100% +83% |
| Average Mediatek Helio G80 (1165 - 1202, n=9) | 1187 Points ∼55% 0% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096 | 1182 Points ∼55% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096 | 771 Points ∼36% -35% |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 JLQ JR510, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072 | 512 Points ∼24% -57% |
| Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096 | 383 Points ∼18% -68% |
| Average of class Smartphone (688 - 4603, n=157, past 2 years) | 2771 Points ∼100% +18% |
| Average Mediatek Helio G80 (2347 - 2669, n=9) | 2536 Points ∼92% +8% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096 | 2347 Points ∼85% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096 | 1899 Points ∼69% -19% |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 JLQ JR510, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072 | 1734 Points ∼63% -26% |
| Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096 | 1265 Points ∼46% -46% |
| Average of class Smartphone (91 - 13223, n=228, past 2 years) | 4276 Points ∼100% +215% |
| Average Mediatek Helio G80 (1347 - 1387, n=9) | 1366 Points ∼32% +1% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096 | 1357 Points ∼32% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096 | 916 Points ∼21% -32% |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 JLQ JR510, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072 | 605 Points ∼14% -55% |
| Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096 | 536 Points ∼13% -61% |
| Average of class Smartphone (73 - 20955, n=227, past 2 years) | 5578 Points ∼100% +368% |
| Average Mediatek Helio G80 (1179 - 1875, n=9) | 1274 Points ∼23% +7% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096 | 1192 Points ∼21% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096 | 791 Points ∼14% -34% |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 JLQ JR510, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072 | 508 Points ∼9% -57% |
| Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096 | 460 Points ∼8% -61% |
| Average of class Smartphone (635 - 5857, n=227, past 2 years) | 3285 Points ∼100% +25% |
| Average Mediatek Helio G80 (2564 - 2830, n=9) | 2672 Points ∼81% +1% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096 | 2636 Points ∼80% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096 | 2054 Points ∼63% -22% |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 JLQ JR510, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072 | 1840 Points ∼56% -30% |
| Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096 | 1283 Points ∼39% -51% |
| Average of class Smartphone (216 - 10062, n=200, past 2 years) | 3113 Points ∼100% +356% |
| Average Mediatek Helio G80 (679 - 691, n=8) | 686 Points ∼22% +1% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096 | 682 Points ∼22% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096 | 513 Points ∼16% -25% |
| Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096 | Points ∼0% -100% |
| Average of class Smartphone (205 - 12429, n=218, past 2 years) | 3929 Points ∼100% +476% |
| Average Mediatek Helio G80 (682 - 691, n=8) | 685 Points ∼17% 0% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096 | 682 Points ∼17% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096 | 509 Points ∼13% -25% |
| Average of class Smartphone (22 - 3383, n=192, past 2 years) | 1093 Points ∼100% +539% |
| Average Mediatek Helio G80 (171 - 176, n=8) | 174.3 Points ∼16% +2% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096 | 171 Points ∼16% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096 | 139 Points ∼13% -19% |
| Average of class Smartphone (101 - 3265, n=186, past 2 years) | 1099 Points ∼100% +543% |
| Average Mediatek Helio G80 (171 - 186, n=8) | 173.8 Points ∼16% +2% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096 | 171 Points ∼16% |
| Average of class Smartphone (4.7 - 104, n=258, past 2 years) | 31.9 fps ∼100% +294% |
| Average Mediatek Helio G80 (8 - 18, n=9) | 12.2 fps ∼38% +51% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096 | 8.1 fps ∼25% |
| Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096 | 7 fps ∼22% -14% |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 JLQ JR510, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072 | 7 fps ∼22% -14% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096 | 5.3 fps ∼17% -35% |
| Average of class Smartphone (1.9 - 136, n=260, past 2 years) | 39.5 fps ∼100% +329% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096 | 9.2 fps ∼23% |
| Average Mediatek Helio G80 (8.7 - 9.2, n=9) | 9.09 fps ∼23% -1% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096 | 6.1 fps ∼15% -34% |
| Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096 | 4 fps ∼10% -57% |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 JLQ JR510, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072 | 3.9 fps ∼10% -58% |
| Average of class Smartphone (3 - 86, n=259, past 2 years) | 22.5 fps ∼100% +341% |
| Average Mediatek Helio G80 (5.1 - 11, n=9) | 7.3 fps ∼32% +43% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096 | 5.1 fps ∼23% |
| Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096 | 5 fps ∼22% -2% |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 JLQ JR510, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072 | 4.5 fps ∼20% -12% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096 | 3.3 fps ∼15% -35% |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.7 - 52, n=260, past 2 years) | 15.1 fps ∼100% +358% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096 | 3.3 fps ∼22% |
| Average Mediatek Helio G80 (3.2 - 3.3, n=9) | 3.28 fps ∼22% -1% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096 | 2.2 fps ∼15% -33% |
| Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096 | 1.5 fps ∼10% -55% |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 JLQ JR510, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072 | 1.4 fps ∼9% -58% |
| Average of class Smartphone (3905 - 74261, n=191, past 2 years) | 26569 Points ∼100% +117% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096 | 12253 Points ∼46% |
| Average Mediatek Helio G80 (10432 - 12744, n=7) | 11460 Points ∼43% -6% |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 JLQ JR510, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072 | 5975 Points ∼22% -51% |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096 | 5904 Points ∼22% -52% |
| Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096 | 5648 Points ∼21% -54% |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 300.6 | 308.5 3% | 281.7 -6% | 215.45 -28% | 273 ?(95.6 - 704, n=192) -9% | 975 ?(45.6 - 1999, n=255, past 2 years) 224% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 230.3 | 236.8 3% | 129.8 -44% | 112.78 -51% | 177.1 ?(40 - 274, n=192) -23% | 547 ?(11.9 - 1776, n=255, past 2 years) 138% |
| Random Read 4KB | 94.5 | 104.4 10% | 29.2 -69% | 39.32 -58% | 59 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=192) -38% | 178.9 ?(13.5 - 390, n=255, past 2 years) 89% |
| Random Write 4KB | 61.5 | 67.3 9% | 67.7 10% | 16.34 -73% | 31.5 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=192) -49% | 179.5 ?(18.4 - 503, n=256, past 2 years) 192% |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 38.1 °C = 101 F Average: 32 °C = 90 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 42.3 °C = 108 F Average: 33.8 °C = 93 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Supply (max.) 40.3 °C = 105 F | Room Temperature 20.1 °C = 68 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The mean somesthesia for the precocious broadside nether maximal load is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the mean of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices successful the people Smartphone.
(+) The maximum somesthesia connected the precocious broadside is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the mean of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the people Smartphone.
(±) The bottommost heats up to a maximum of 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the mean of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the mean somesthesia for the precocious broadside is 22.6 °C / 73 F, compared to the instrumentality mean of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.044 (1.037-1.056)
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø0.84 (0.827-0.851)
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.12 (4.05-4.14)
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.07 (3.06-3.08)
Frequency diagram (checkboxes tin beryllium checked and unchecked to comparison devices)
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F audio analysis
(+) | speakers tin play comparatively large (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | astir nary bass - connected mean 25.5% little than median
(±) | linearity of bass is mean (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - connected mean 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is mean (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - connected mean 8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of wide dependable is mean (23.7% quality to median)
Compared to aforesaid class
» 55% of each tested devices successful this people were better, 11% similar, 34% worse
» The champion had a delta of 12%, mean was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to each devices tested
» 72% of each tested devices were better, 7% similar, 21% worse
» The champion had a delta of 3%, mean was 20%, worst was 65%
Motorola Moto G22 audio analysis
(+) | speakers tin play comparatively large (86.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | astir nary bass - connected mean 32.3% little than median
(±) | linearity of bass is mean (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - connected mean 5.1% little than median
(±) | linearity of mids is mean (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - connected mean 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of wide dependable is mean (26.5% quality to median)
Compared to aforesaid class
» 75% of each tested devices successful this people were better, 7% similar, 19% worse
» The champion had a delta of 12%, mean was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to each devices tested
» 84% of each tested devices were better, 4% similar, 12% worse
» The champion had a delta of 3%, mean was 20%, worst was 65%
Battery Runtime
| WiFi Websurfing | 14h 56min | |
Pros
+ high solution screen
+ no PWM
+ stable WLAN signal
+ good performance
Cons
- very elemental casing
- only the astir indispensable 4G frequencies
It is chiefly the higher show that makes the Galaxy A13 4G A137F superior to its sister model: everything runs a spot smoother and you person a spot much reserves for much analyzable apps, adjacent though the instrumentality is of people inactive not a powerhouse and alternatively intended for elemental applications.
The different differences betwixt the versions are constricted to the little surface brightness and the artillery life, which is somewhat improved with the caller SoC. It is simply a pity that Samsung does not usage the SoC's possibilities with higher charging speeds and much LTE frequencies.
Overall, we would similar the New Edition implicit the inactive disposable Galaxy A13 4G with Exynos SoC. However, if you get the older mentation overmuch cheaper, the differences are not large capable to warrant a beardown surcharge either.
The MediaTek SoC has made the Galaxy A13 4G much powerful, but the differences to the Exynos exemplary are different rather small.
The runtimes of the Xiaomi Poco C40 are importantly longer, but you person to unrecorded with little performance. The Moto G22 from Motorola has a little resolution, but a 90-Hz panel.
If you privation to bargain the mentation of Samsung's Galaxy A13 4G with a accelerated MediaTek processor, you should look retired for the summation "New Edition" and/or the exemplary fig A137F. This is disposable directly from the manufacturer successful each colors for 148 Euros successful the 64 GB variant.
The smaller 32 GB variant tin beryllium recovered astatine retailers connected the Internet, for illustration astatine our lender notebooksbilliger.de. It costs 150 Euros, truthful Samsung's store offers a amended woody with much retention astatine the clip of testing. The 64 GB mentation costs conscionable nether 170 Euros astatine notebooksbilliger.de and with 128 GB it is disposable for 190 Euros.
Also astatine different retailers similar Cyberport oregon amazon.com the telephone is besides disposable from banal astatine the clip of testing.
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F
-
11/07/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt
Connectivity
45 / 70 → 64%
Games Performance
16 / 64 → 25%
Application Performance
60 / 86 → 70%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
Editor of the original article: Florian Schmitt - Managing Editor Mobile - 974 articles published connected Notebookcheck since 2009
I initially wrote astir gaming laptops erstwhile I joined Notebookcheck successful 2009. I was past progressive with the setup of the examination portal Notebookinfo and worked with societal media concepts for ample companies similar BMW and Adidas, portion besides returning to enactment for Notebookcheck successful 2012. Nowadays, I absorption connected smartphones, tablets, and aboriginal technologies. Since 2018 I person been Managing Editor for mobile instrumentality reviews, moving alongside my workfellow Daniel Schmidt.
Translator: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 268886 articles published connected Notebookcheck since 2008
My main work arsenic an editorial adjunct is maintaining the Library section, which aggregates reviews from different publications and channels. In addition, my regular meal is Notebookcheck's agelong database of caller content, which I comb done to prime the astir absorbing topics for translation from English to French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, and Dutch."
Florian Schmitt, 2022-11- 7 (Update: 2022-11- 7)
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24020034/226270_iPHONE_14_PHO_akrales_0595.jpg)
English (US)