Skin Cancer Exam in Primary Care: More Harm Than Good - Medscape

2 years ago 39

Kenneth W. Lin, MD, MPH

Hi, everyone. I'm Dr Kenny Lin. I americium a household doc and subordinate manager of  the Lancaster General Hospital Family Medicine Residency, and I blog at Common Sense Family Doctor.

A important information of my signifier consists of big wellness attraction visits. Acknowledging the never-ending statement astir the value of wide wellness checks successful good persons, I inactive spot these visits arsenic opportunities to supply recommended immunizations, screening tests, and counseling connected steadfast manner habits. I besides execute a carnal exam. Whether this exam should see a head-to-toe survey for tegument crab has agelong been uncertain.

The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) precocious released a draft proposal statement that reiterates erstwhile assessments that determination isn't capable grounds to justice whether screening for tegument crab successful an average-risk diligent without a past of crab is beneficial. Nonetheless, galore family physicians and wide internists bash full-body tegument exams oregon notation patients to dermatologists to get them done. In the tone of reevaluating established screening practices, I volition marque the lawsuit that tegument crab screening does much harm than good, truthful we should halt doing it.

Using information from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, a probe squad demonstrated that the incidence of cutaneous melanoma has accrued sixfold implicit the past 40 years, whereas the incidence of noncutaneous melanoma did not change. Sunburns and tanning beds can't explicate this melodramatic summation successful tegument cancers, they argued; instead, greater diagnostic scrutiny (more full-body tegument exams), expanding usage of tegument biopsies, and falling pathologic thresholds for diagnosing melanoma are the astir apt culprits. Because the melanoma mortality complaint did not budge, it's apt that astir of the further tegument cancers detected by screening did not necessitate attraction and were overdiagnosed.

How tin we reason that much screening is driving much tegument crab diagnoses alternatively than immoderate biology hazard factor? Several years ago, a national study recovered a correlation betwixt the density of superior attraction physicians and accrued hazard for melanoma diagnosis: "Per 100,000 people, an further 10 PCPs per region was associated with 1.62 further cases of melanoma per year." These further melanomas were overwhelmingly early-stage, with nary associations with later-stage melanoma oregon melanoma deaths. A caller cross-sectional study confirmed that melanoma incidence successful US counties rises arsenic the proviso of superior attraction physicians and dermatologists increases, whereas proxies of vulnerability to ultraviolet radiation had nary relation with melanoma incidence.

Granted, overdiagnosis occurs successful screening for breast, lung, and prostate cancers too, and that doesn't mean those tests aren't worthy doing if patients are adequately informed astir this imaginable harm. Similarly, detecting "extra" melanomas done tegument exams mightiness beryllium worthwhile if treating each of those early-stage lesions spared lives oregon lessened the morbidity associated with later-stage treatments. Unfortunately, the grounds suggests that doesn't happen. In a German survey reviewed by the USPSTF, aft the implementation of a nationalist regular tegument crab screening programme covered by wellness insurance, melanoma mortality went up, not down. Closer to home, a superior care-based skin crab screening initiative astatine the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center recovered that aft 5 years, screened patients were much apt to beryllium diagnosed with bladed melanomas but not little apt to beryllium diagnosed with thicker ones, which an accompanying editorial observed is "a classical signature of overdiagnosis."

Don't misunderstand me: I americium not encouraging my colleagues to disregard patients' concerns astir changing moles oregon to look the different mode if they hap to spot a suspicious lesion successful the process of performing a carnal introspection for different reasons. What I americium saying is that the clip it takes to bash a thorough tegument introspection could beryllium amended spent connected providing effectual preventive services that bash not taxable patients to the inconvenience and risks of needless tegument procedures.

Follow Medscape connected Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube

Read Entire Article