Supreme Court to hear death row inmate Rodney Reed's appeal for new DNA testing - CNN

CNN  — 

The Supreme Court struggled with the lawsuit of Rodney Reed connected Tuesday, a Black decease enactment inmate seeking post-conviction DNA grounds to beryllium his innocence. He claims an all-White assemblage wrongly convicted him of sidesplitting a White pistillate successful Texas successful 1998.

Since his conviction, Texas courts person rejected his assorted appeals. Celebrities specified arsenic Kim Kardashian and Rihanna person expressed support, signing a petition asking the authorities to halt his execution.

At oral arguments, a lawyer for the authorities suggested Reed was making his arguments successful bid to hold his execution, but it was unclear if the lawyer swayed each of the blimpish justices. The authorities warned against inmates being capable to “avail themselves” of “endless process successful authorities courts.”

The lawsuit puts a caller absorption connected the investigating of DNA crime-scene grounds and erstwhile an inmate tin marque a assertion to entree the exertion successful a plea of innocence. To date, 375 radical successful the United States person been exonerated by DNA testing, including 21 who served clip connected decease row, according to the Innocence Project, a radical that represents Reed and different clients seeking post-conviction DNA investigating to beryllium their innocence.

Justice Elena Kagan seemed to hold with Reed’s attorney, saying it was important for the afloat appeals process to play retired earlier an inmate asked a national tribunal to intervene.

“Isn’t the simplest happening conscionable to accidental that the idiosyncratic isn’t harmed until the authorities process has travel to an extremity and we cognize for a information what the authorities judgement is?” she asked.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson besides agreed, noting that if an inmate were to bring the situation earlier the authorities proceedings were over, a national tribunal would apt determination to enactment the entreaty connected clasp until the authorities enactment concludes.

But Chief Justice John Roberts expressed interest astatine 1 constituent for inmates seeking to debar an contiguous entreaty arsenic a mode to “put off” an execution.

For his part, Justice Brett Kavanaugh was funny successful the “practical problems” courts would look if an inmate had to bring a national tribunal situation earlier the authorities procedures were exhausted.

Court precedent allows a authorities captive who has been denied successful authorities tribunal to prosecute a post-conviction assertion for DNA investigating successful national court. But Reed’s lawsuit raises a statute of limitations question astir whether specified a assertion tin beryllium brought astatine the extremity of authorities tribunal litigation oregon astatine the infinitesimal a proceedings tribunal denied DNA testing.

Lower courts person divided connected the contented and the favoritism is cardinal for Reed arsenic a national appeals tribunal ruled that helium waited excessively agelong to bring his claim. How the Supreme Court rules could interaction different decease enactment inmates crossed the state seeking to trial caller evidence. And comes arsenic DNA investigating has go a much utilized means to exonerate those who person been wrongly convicted.

Reed has been connected decease enactment for the execution of 19-year-old Stacey Stites.

A passerby recovered Stites’ assemblage adjacent a garment and a torn portion of belt. Investigators targeted Reed due to the fact that his sperm was recovered wrong her. Reed acknowledged the 2 were having an affair, but says that her fiancé, a section constabulary serviceman named Jimmy Fennell, was the past to spot her alive.

Reed claims that implicit the past 2 decades helium has discovered a “considerable assemblage of evidence” demonstrating his innocence. Reed claims that the DNA investigating would constituent to Fennell arsenic the execution suspect. Fennell was aboriginal jailed for sexually assaulting a pistillate successful his custody and Reed claims that galore witnesses said helium had threatened to strangle Stites with a loop if helium ever caught her cheating connected him. Reed seeks to trial the loop recovered astatine the country that was utilized to strangle Stites.

The Texas instrumentality astatine contented allows a convicted idiosyncratic to get post-conviction DNA investigating of biologic worldly if the tribunal finds that definite conditions are met. Reed was denied. He came to the Supreme Court successful 2018 and was denied again. Now helium is challenging the constitutionality of the Texas instrumentality arguing that the denial of the DNA investigating violates his owed process rights.

But the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals held that helium waited excessively agelong to bring the claim. “An wounded accrues erstwhile a plaintiff archetypal becomes aware, oregon should person go aware, that his close had been violated.” The tribunal said that helium became alert of that successful 2014 and that his existent assertion is “time barred.”

Reed’s lawyers argued that helium could lone bring the assertion erstwhile the authorities appeals tribunal had ruled, astatine the extremity of authorities tribunal litigation. In court, Parker Rider-Longmaid said that the “clock doesn’t commencement ticking” until authorities tribunal proceedings travel to an end. He said Texas’ speechmaking of the instrumentality would mean that different procedures successful the appellate process are “irrelevant.”

Janai Nelson of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund supports Reed arguing successful briefs that the “overwhelming bulk of incarcerated persons exonerated done DNA grounds since its instauration successful 1989, person been radical of colour and chiefly Black men.”

Texas Solicitor General Judd Stone II responded successful tribunal papers that astatine proceedings the authorities introduced “substantial” grounds that Reed had “sexually assaulted aggregate different women.” Besides arguing that the suit is untimely, helium besides says that Reed’s assertion cannot beryllium brought due to the fact that helium lacks the ineligible right, oregon “standing,” to bring the case.