Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribune’s regular newsletter that keeps readers up to velocity connected the astir indispensable Texas news.
A achromatic antheral Texan who was rejected by six Texas aesculapian schools filed a class-action suit Tuesday claiming that they illegally see contention and enactment during admissions due to the fact that they accepted Black, Hispanic and pistillate students whose world credentials were inferior to those of achromatic oregon Asian applicants.
Plaintiff George Stewart filed the suit against Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, the University of Texas astatine Austin, University of Texas Health Science Center astatine Houston, University of Texas Medical Branch astatine Galveston, University of Texas Health Science Center astatine San Antonio and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, arsenic good arsenic their presidents, aesculapian schoolhouse deans and admissions officers.
The suit comes arsenic the blimpish bulk successful the U.S. Supreme Court appears poised to rotation backmost policies that let contention to beryllium considered successful assemblage admissions successful 2 cases argued earlier the tribunal past fall. The tribunal is expected to regularisation connected those cases this spring.
Those lawsuits were brought to the precocious tribunal by the affirmative-action hostile radical Students for Fair Admissions, a nonprofit led by Edward Blum. Blum played a cardinal relation successful the ineligible situation to UT-Austin’s admissions policy, which UT-Austin yet won. Now, the radical is seeking to overturn Grutter v. Bollinger, a 2003 Supreme Court ruling that upheld U.S. colleges’ quality to see contention successful admissions successful definite cases.
In the caller suit against Texas aesculapian schools, filed successful U.S. District Court successful Lubbock, Stewart is represented by America First Legal, a radical created by Stephen Miller, a erstwhile argumentation advisor to erstwhile President Donald Trump, and Jonathan Mitchell, a erstwhile solicitor wide for Texas and the ineligible designer of the state’s six-week termination ban.
Stewart’s suit alleges that the admissions practices astatine the six aesculapian schools interruption the U.S. Constitution, including the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.
According to the lawsuit, Stewart graduated from UT-Austin with a 3.96 people constituent mean and a biology degree. He scored a 511 retired of a imaginable 528 connected the exam required for admission, known arsenic the MCAT, and spent 2 years applying to aesculapian schools.
After helium was rejected by the schools, Stewart filed an open-records petition to get admissions information for each school, which included the race, sex, GPA and MCAT people of each applicant who applied for the 2021-22 schoolhouse year.
The suit says that according to an investigation of the data, the median and mean GPAs and MCAT scores of Black and Hispanic students were little than those of achromatic and Asian students. The suit besides says the information shows that accepted pistillate students had little MCAT scores than antheral students.
“The information show that each of the suspect aesculapian schools is providing admissions preferences to female, black, and Hispanic applicants portion unlawfully discriminating against whites, Asians, and men successful admissions decisions,” the suit alleges.
It besides points to a argumentation astatine the John Sealy School of Medicine astatine the University of Texas Medical Branch astatine Galveston that says the admissions committee seeks to admit qualified applicants who are underrepresented successful medicine and economically disadvantaged.
A spokesperson for the University of Texas System declined to remark connected the lawsuit. A Texas Tech University System spokesperson said the strategy had not yet been served with the suit and does not remark connected pending litigation.
The suit states that Stewart is “able and ready” to reapply to each of the aesculapian schools, but existent policies forestall him from “competing connected adjacent presumption with different applicants.” Stewart is asking the tribunal to prohibit the aesculapian schools from considering contention oregon enactment successful pupil admissions and would necessitate the schools to take applicants “in a color-bind and sex-neutral manner.”
It’s the 2nd suit filed against a Texas assemblage by an idiosyncratic represented by the radical arsenic it tries to spot distant astatine affirmative action, which Miller called an “illegal ‘equity’ polic[y]” successful a statement.
In September, a UT-Austin prof represented by America First Legal filed a class-action suit against Texas A&M University, alleging a caller module fellowship programme discriminated against achromatic and Asian applicants. In December, assemblage lawyers filed a question to disregard the lawsuit, stating that the professor’s arguments were hypothetical due to the fact that the prof ne'er applied for the program. The professor, Richard Lowery, dismissed the claims against the assemblage 3 weeks later.
Disclosure: Texas A&M University, Texas Tech University, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Texas Tech University System, University of Texas astatine Austin, University of Texas Health Science Center astatine San Antonio, University of Texas Medical Branch astatine Galveston and University of Texas System person been fiscal supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan quality enactment that is funded successful portion by donations from members, foundations and firm sponsors. Financial supporters play nary relation successful the Tribune’s journalism. Find a implicit list of them here.
English (US)