VAR: Release of in-game audio a 'small step forward', says referees' chief Howard Webb

The video adjunct referee (VAR) strategy was introduced to the Premier League astatine the commencement of the 2019-20 season

Releasing in-game audio of video adjunct referee decisions is simply a "small measurement forward", and thing referees' governing assemblage Professional Game Match Officials Limited volition look to bash much adjacent season, says its main Howard Webb.

In a bid to amended transparency, Webb appeared connected Sky Sports to speech done however cardinal decisions were reached, alongside pundits Jamie Carragher and Gary Neville.

"We're looking to bash this [release audio] arsenic overmuch arsenic we perchance can," Webb said connected Monday Night Football.

"Tonight is evidently thing new. We're making a tiny measurement forward. Going guardant into adjacent play we volition look to bash much of the same.

"We can't play it live, Fifa don't let america to play it retired during the crippled - who knows wherever that mightiness spell successful the aboriginal - but determination is thing to halt america showing that accusation later."

Audio was released from six matches this season, with supporters capable to perceive the discussions earlier Webb offered further insight.

Newcastle 0-2 Arsenal - VAR overturns punishment determination (7 May)

Jakub Kiwior was penalised for handball pursuing a changeable from Bruno Guimaraes

What happened?

Referee Chris Kavanagh awarded Newcastle a punishment for handball erstwhile Bruno Guimaraes' changeable struck Jakub Kiwior, nevertheless VAR Michael Salisbury overturned the determination with replays showing the shot had archetypal deed the defender's thigh earlier immoderate interaction with his arm.

What was the absorption astatine the time?

Speaking connected BBC Radio 5 Live, erstwhile Liverpool defender Stephen Warnock said: "It's travel disconnected the thigh past connected to the arm, it's decidedly not a penalty. I don't cognize wherefore the Newcastle fans are truthful irate."

What was discussed?

VAR Salisbury: "We are going to cheque the punishment for you... tin you corroborate it is decidedly the limb and it's not deed the thigh first? We request to corroborate it is not his thigh.

"It looks similar it is thigh connected to arm. So the limb is, to me, successful a earthy position. The shot comes disconnected the thigh and makes a question into that arm. I don't judge it is not a punishment kick.

"I'm going to urge an on-field reappraisal connected the punishment you person awarded. What we are showing you is the interaction of the shot and the presumption of the arm."

On-field referee Kavanagh: "So we person a deflection disconnected the genu first. Show maine erstwhile more. The limb is adjacent in, my archetypal absorption was the limb was out, truthful I'll restart with a drop-ball to the goalkeeper."

Webb's explanation:

"There are 2 things connected this one. The shot intelligibly strikes the thigh - the shorts determination - and besides the limb is moving backmost into the assemblage and makes the subordinate smaller. The limb is not successful the presumption the referee thought it was.

"I'm truly keen to marque definite that our usage of VAR is consistent. This 1 is simply a bully usage of VAR due to the fact that it is antithetic to what the referee saw. There is inactive immoderate lawsuit for the referee to reappraisal the determination connected this one."

Chelsea 0-0 Liverpool - VAR overturns Havertz extremity (4 April)

A VAR reappraisal intelligibly showed Kai Havertz's extremity should beryllium disallowed

What happened?

Kai Havertz had a extremity ruled retired for handball aft VAR Kavanagh informed referee Anthony Taylor that the shot had gone successful disconnected the Chelsea forward's limb aft his archetypal changeable rebounded disconnected goalkeeper Alisson.

What was the absorption astatine the time?

Speaking connected BBC Radio 5 Live, erstwhile Arsenal defender Matt Upson said: "You tin spot connected the replay helium conscionable holds his elbow up. It's a bully prevention from Alisson truly due to the fact that helium does enactment large and it comes disconnected Havertz's limb and ricochets backmost into the net."

What was discussed?

On-field referee Taylor: "On-field determination is extremity due to the fact that I deliberation it hits Havertz's chest."

VAR Kavanagh: "It's factual. Just framework it connected the arm. Right, that is intelligibly the arm. I urge you disallow the goal. It is handball, leads instantly to the shot successful the net. It's factual."

Webb's explanation:

"It's an accidental for the VAR officials to spot thing the on-field referee couldn't. You perceive Taylor accidental helium thinks it hits the chest, but we cognize if it goes successful disconnected the limb it has to beryllium disallowed.

"In this concern the referee doesn't request to spot the surface due to the fact that it's factual. There is nary request for immoderate different interpretation.

"Rather than discarded clip by sending the referee to the screen, we overturn the determination determination and past and effort and beryllium arsenic businesslike arsenic we can."

Brentford 2-0 Bournemouth - VAR fails to overturn punishment (14 January)

Howard Webb explained that VAR should person awarded a free-kick to Bournemouth but failed to analyse an earlier foul

What happened? On-field referee Jarred Gillett awarded Brentford a punishment due to the fact that of a foul by Marcos Senesi connected Ivan Toney, a telephone which was supported by VAR Marriner, contempt Toney appearing to clasp the defender's limb earlier the foul occurred.

What was the absorption astatine the time? Bournemouth manager Gary O'Neil called the determination to grant the punishment "scandalous", adding: "I don't cognize however you get that incorrect with VAR." But, speaking connected BBC Radio 5 Live, erstwhile Wales defender James Collins said it was "a wide punishment and "very clumsy".

What was discussed?

Referee Gillett: "The 2nd one. Holding with the limb astir him and dragging him down."

VAR Marriner: "There is capable to enactment that. Check complete."

Webb's explanation:

"I don't deliberation there's thing to suggest that is simply a wide error, but evidently we're not lone checking the last enactment but besides the signifier that leads into that decision.

"In this concern we spot a foul by Toney connected Senesi, earlier Senesi puts his limb connected Toney. The series didn't commencement aboriginal enough. It's a substance of process arsenic opposed to judgement. Toney locks successful and traps his limb and this should beryllium penalised with a free-kick for Bournemouth.

"We cognize that agelong checks tin origin immoderate vexation but we're hoping that by playing these audios retired you tin spot there's a process.

"We can't sacrifice accuracy for speed. In this case, VAR didn't thoroughly analyse the afloat series that led to that interaction betwixt Toney and Senesi. If it had, it would person shown the enactment by Toney and led to the punishment being overturned."

• Our sum of your Premier League nine is bigger and amended than ever earlier - follow your squad and motion up for notifications successful the BBC Sport app to marque definite you ne'er miss a moment